Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Mizanur Rahman Vs. The State and another
2
Nasim Ahmed Vs. The State
Disposed of.
3
Monjur Hossain Khan and others vs. Md. Kamrul Hassan and others
ABSOLUTE
4
Md. Khoyrat Hossain vs the state
5
Mst. Rina Akter being dead his heirs- Tahura Akter and others Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and another
6
Md. Rais Uddin -Vs- Md. Taiz Uddin Ahammed Taz and others
An application under Order 9 rule 13 CPC, which gave rise to Miscellaneous Case No. 106 of 1989, was filed on 16.11.89. From this it is apparent that this application for setting aside the ex parte decree was filed after 49 days from the date of passing the impugned decree. Article 164 of the Limitation Act provides that an application for setting aside an ex parte decree shall have to be filed within 30 days from the date of the decree where summons was duly served and within 30 days from the date of knowledge when summons was not duly served. In our case under review there is no denial of the fact of due service of summons. So, evidently this case is governed by Article 164 of the Limitation Act, which provides that the application for setting aside the ex parte decree is required to be filed within 30 days from the date of decree impugned.
7
S. M. Prince (Babu) -Vs- Md. Tozammel Haque Sarker and others
The plaintiff mentioned the number of the C.S. and S. A. Khatians and also the plot numbers in the suit, and thus, there was full compliance with the provisions of Order VII Rule 3 of the Code. And since no fraction or portion of the lands of the two plots was claimed, there was no necessity of giving any Chauhaddi or boundary of the suit plots. "If the dispute involves complicated questions of title, the plaintiff must establish his title by filing a regular suit for declaration of title. A simple suit for a permanent injunction should not be allowed to be used as a testing device to ascertain the title".
8
Sultan Ahamed Vs. The State
9
Sultan Ahamed Vs. The State
10
Most. Julekha Khatun vs the state and another
11
Falik Uddin Chowdhury being died his legal heirs: petitioner Nos. 1-8. =Versus= Fazlur Rahman Chowdhury and another
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure
12
Sadequl and others =Versus= Sadir Ahmmod and others
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
13
Md. Mozammel Hoque {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(a)-1(g)}. =Versus= Md. Abdul Hamid Mollah {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(Ka)-1(Chha)} and others
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Decree)
14
Sreemoti Chapala Bala Das and others =Versus= Mrinal Kanti Shaha {(O.P. No. 2 died leaving behind her legal heirs: 2(a), 2(b)
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
15
Md. Zarzis =Versus= Moulana Md. Idris alias Md. Idris Ali {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(a)-1(f)} and subsequently O.P No. 1(e). Most. Zakera Khatun died leaving behind her legal heirs: 1(e)(i)- 1(e)(vi)
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
16
Md. Khabir Uddin and others =Versus= Mowlana Abdul Wahab {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(a)-1(v)}and others
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
17
Mohammad Aminul Haque and others =Versus= Md. Jalal Ahmed and another
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Decree)
18
Sree Sunil Kumar Dev ........ Plaintiff-petitioner -Versus- Sreemati Parul Rani Chowdhury being dead her heirs Ashish Kumar Chowdhury alias Chandu and others .... Defendant-opposite parties
19
Md. Solaiman Hossen -Vs- Md. Anwar Hossen and others
The onus of proof entirely lies upon the party, who asserts that the transfer is a sub-kabala in disguise of a deed of exchange under section 101 and 103 of the Evidence Act [ I of 1872] The preemptor`s incumbent duty is to prove by adequate tangible, credible evidence that the deed in question is out and out a sale deed, in disguise of a deed of exchange.
20
Gopendra Kumar Das being dead his heirs Dulan Kumar Talukder and others Vs. Dharoni Das and others
Appeal is allowed remanding the suit to the trial Court.
21
Mowlavi Siddique Ahammad and others Vs. Kabir Ahamad and others
22
Md. Abdul Khalek, being dead, his heirs: Md. Oyaz Kuruny and others -Vs- Md. Monayem Hossain and others
Any land recorded in Khatian as Bagan Bari, Bithi, Bari but situated outside the municipal area should fall within the definition of agricultural land. Mention of a wrong provision or omission to mention the provision containing the source of power will not invalidate an order where such power exists.
23
Monira Begum Promi-Vs-Mohammad Kaium
24
Mrs. Ponia Akter, wife of late Abdur Rahim and another.-Vs-Md. Alamin alias Montu, son of late Ahamad Hossain of village- Dhekia, Police Station- Hossainpur, District- Kishoreganj and others.
Appeal allowed and rule discharged
25
Md. Rafiq Ahmed vs the state
26
Khandaker Soikat vs the state
27
Sinha Power Generation Company Limited, having its registered office at Mohakhali Tower (13th Floor), 82 Mohakhali Commercial Area, Dhaka-1212 represented by its Managing Director, namely, Arifur Rahman Sinha.-Vs-Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) represented by its Chairman having office at Wapda Building, 1st Floor, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000.
Appeal dismissed and rule discharged
28
Mostofa Mohsin vs t he state and another
29
Md. Harunur Rashid Vs. Motiar Rahman and others
30
Md. Ramiz Uddin being dead his legal hiers_ Mosammot Meherun Nessa and others Vs. Sree Somir Ranjan Sarkar and others
31
Md. Ataur Rahman Prodhan Vs. Most Monira Begum and others
32
Sufia Khatun and others Vs. Muksud Ali and others
33
Md. Gour Ali VS. Md. Jahangir Miah and others
34
Alamgir and others Vs. Shalah Uddin and others
Appeal is allowed.
35
Siraj Miah being dead his legal heirs Akbar Hossain and others Vs.Ataur Rahman being dead his heirs Siddika Begum and others
Appeal is disposed of.
36
Mrs. Salma Begum and another Vs. Md. Monowar Hossain Choukidar and others
Appeal is dismissed.
37
Umme Kulsum (Sriti) and others ........ Defendant-petitioners -Versus- A.T.M. Jashimuddin being dead his heirs A.H.M. Kamruzzaman (Apu) and others ....... Plaintiff-opposite parties
38
Umme Kulsum (Sriti) and others ........ Defendant-petitioners -Versus- A.T.M. Jashimuddin being dead his heirs A.H.M. Kamruzzaman (Apu) and others ....... Plaintiff-opposite parties
39
Md. Muzaffar Ali Sarker ...Petitioner -Versus- Most. Sufia Bewa and others …Opposite parties
40
Md. Rahim Uddin Gain ...Pre-emptee-petitioner -Versus- Md. Mozibar Rahman Molla and others …Opposite parties
41
42
Md. Jalal vs the state
43
Md. Rafiq Ahmed vs. the state
44
Dilruba Begum and others Vs. Bangladesh Bank, Chittagong
45
Bhawal Engineers
46
Shahena Aktar alias Rina Vs. Abdul Zafur alias Zahur Miah and others
Rule is discharged
47
Yunus Ali and others Vs. Abul Hossain and others
48
Md. Nurul Islam Vs. Abdus Sattar and others
49
Dulal Ahmed-Vs-Md. Abu Bokor and others
Disposed of
50
Mst. Sakina Khatun ....Petitioner -Versus- The State ….Opposite party
This Site is Visited :