Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
2
Most. Sajeda Begum vs The State
Rule Absolute
3
Monir Sarder and others vs the State
4
Md. Abu Saleque vs the State and another
5
Md. Bayezid Hossain vs the State and another
6
Taj Mohammad and others ...Petitioners. -Versus- Alta Miah and others ....Opposite parties.
7
Md. Shakhawat Hossain Masum -Versus- The State and another
8
Md. Iman Ali -Versus- The State
9
Md. Mizanur Rahman Vs Government of Bangladesh and others
10
Md. Selamat Ullah Miji ...Petitioner. -Versus- Most. Solema Begum and others ....Opposite parties
11
Halima Jahan and others. ...Petitioners. -Versus- Md. Salim Bhuiyan being dead his heirs. Most. Kawsar Begum and others ....Opposite parties
12
13
Bishawjit Sinha
14
Most. Tahmina Khatun
15
Md. Ali Ullah
16
Amir Jahan Dilshad Begum and another vs The State and another
The accused petitioners had any dishonest intention to deceive the money. Moreover, from a plain reading of the petition of complaint and inquiry report it manifests that the accused persons allegedly contracted to rent a shop to the complainant for Tk 1,10,000/- as a security deposit, and whilst the complainant asked the accused persons to return the said security deposit the accused persons refused to pay the money does not constitute any criminal offense. Therefore, we hold that the alleged transaction between the complaint and the accused persons is clearly and admittedly a business transaction and that the allegation brought against the accused petitioners is a civil liability and is a case of non-performance of contract or breach of contract as the ingredients of cheating are vacuous.
17
Chayya Bithi Co-operative Housing Samity Ltd.
18
Md. Moin Ullah Chowdhury Tutul vs The State and another
The learned Judge, Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal, Chattagram by an order dated 21.11.2017 framed the charge against the accused Senoara Begum while discharging the complainant opposite party of the instant case and others from the case. There would, therefore be a natural presumption that the tribunal after discussing shreds of evidence could not conclude that the case filed against the complainant of the instant case was false.
19
Monfor Ali and others vs The State
When the police after the investigation have submitted a final report or a charge sheet once there is no scope in the scheme of the code of criminal procedure to direct the investigating officer to submit a supplementary charge sheet.
20
Gas Transmission Company Limited represented by its Managing Director of GTCL Bhaban, Plot No. F-18/A, Sher-E-Bangla Nagar Administrative Area, Agargaon, Dhaka-1207.-Vs-Businessking Limited represented by its Managing Director of 144, Shantinagar Road, Dhaka-1217 and another
21
Md. Jibon Chowdhury @ Joy Chowdhury
admit and bail
22
Md. Jibon Chowdhury @ Joy Chowdhury
admit and bail
23
Md. Sohrab Ali
admit and bail
24
Md. Sohrab Ali
admit and bail
25
Md. Imran Hossain
admit and bail
26
Md. Imran Hossain
admit and bail
27
Md. Jakir Hossain
admit and bail
28
M/S. City Sugar Industries Ltd.-Vs- Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others
29
ShafiqurRahman Chowdhury ...Petitioner. -Versus- Liakat Ali Chowdhury .
30
Shawon Chowdhury alias Shangkor Prasad Sarker and others ...Petitioners. -Versus- Faridul Alam and another.
31
Md. Nazrul Islam and others. ...Petitioners. -Versus- Amorendra Narayan and others. ....Opposite parties.
32
Zayeda Begum . ...Appellant. -Versus- Md. Rafiqul Islam @ Fenu and others ....Respondents.
33
Md. Humayun Kabir and others ...Petitioners. -Versus- Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others . ....Opposite parties.
34
1(a) Niati Bala Nath and another Vs. Rashid Ahmed and others
35
Great Wall Ceramic Industries Ltd.-Vs- National Board of Revenue Represented by its Chairman, NBR Bhaban, Segunbagicha, Dhaka and others
36
Mrs. Ummun Naser and others vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramana, Dhaka and others
The impugned order dated 19.08.2013 has been issued by the respondent concerned vide Warrant Notice No.87 under Section 202(1)(f) of the Customs Act, 1969 giving direction upon the concerned banks to freeze the respective bank accounts of the petitioners. However, said power of the Customs authority may be authorized if there is pending unpaid duties including other contexts as are prescribed therein. In the instant case, order under Section 2021(1)(f) has been issued by the Commissioner concerned stating, inter-alia, that "প্রতিষ্ঠানটির বার্ষিক নিরীক্ষা ০১.০৩.১৯৯৮ ইং হইতে হালনাগাদ অনিস্পন্ন রয়েছে এবং প্রতিষ্ঠানটি অস্তিত্বহীন। মেসার্স ডেল্টা ডাইং এন্ড ফেব্রিক্স লিঃ, ২৩ নং উত্তর রাজশন, সাভার, ঢাকা অদ্যবধি নিরীক্ষা কাজে দলিলাদি দিয়ে সহযোগীতা করেননি। Said context, as relied upon by the Commissioner towards issuance of the impugned order dated 19.08.2023 under Section 202(1) does not go to show that there was pending duties which the petitioners has failed to pay despite giving direction by the authority concerned. In this regard respondent concerned has also failed to show for any other document whatsoever that pursuant to pending demand of duties said order has been issued. In view of the above position of facts and considering the position of law as provided under Section 202 of the Customs Act, 1969, we find substance in the instant Rule.
37
M/S. K L Industries vs Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and another.
38
Mst. Nazma Khatun and others Plaintiffs-Respondents-Petitioners -Versus- Md. Bazlur Rahman Defendant-Appellant-Opposite Party
39
Mir Md. Solaiman being dead his legal heirs 1(ka) Mir Md. Harun-or-Rashid (Babu) and others-Vs-Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation (established and run under President’s Order No. 07 of 1973), Zone-2, represented by its Principal Officer (Law), B.H.B.F.C. Buildings, 22, Purana Paltan, Police Station-Motijheel, Dhaka and others
40
K. Rahman
41
Md Alamgir Vs the State
42
Md. Saju Pramanik vs the State
43
Md. Nasimuzzaman vs The State
44
Md. Nazrul Islam vs The State and another
45
Shahidul Islam Shahin Defendant No. 21- Petitioner Versus Mosammat Aytunnesa being dead her legal heirs: 1(a) Nure Alam Siddiqui and others Plaintiffs-Opposite Parties Ahmed Ali and others Defendants-Opposite Parties
46
Shamsul Alam -Vs- Commissioner, Customs, Excise
47
M/S Rumy Enterprise and others-Vs- Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Bangladesh Secretariat Bhaban, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others.
48
Nahid Hasan
admit and bail
49
Md. Shatil Bin Razzak
admit
50
Md. Lojir alias Lojimuddin
admit and bail
This Site is Visited :