Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Mr. Sahil Humayun and others … Appellants-petitioners -VersusMrs. Rina Humayun and another …Respondents-opposite parties
The appeal is disposed of
2
Md. Shawkat Ali alias Shawkat Mia and another Vs. Land Survey Tribunal, Tangail and others
Rule Nisi is disposed of.
3
Md. Yashin and others. … Defendant -Appellants -VersusSayedul Haque @ Murad Hossain and others. …Plaintiffs-Respondents
The appeal is disposed
4
Mosammat Anwara Begum being dead her heirs 1(a) Khandoker Jakir Hossain and others. … Defendant nos. 5 and 6-Appellants. -VersusMd. Mohosin Dewan and others. …Plaintiffs-Respondents
The appeal is allowed
5
Dhaka Wasa Karmachari Bahmuki Samabaya Samity Limited Vs. Dhaka WASA
6
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Consumer Mitex limited and others
Allowed in part
7
Syed Belayet Hossain - Vs - Mustafizur Rahman
Rule is discharged
8
Mosammat Rowshan Ara - Vs - Md. Altaf Hossain and others
Rule is discharged
9
Amena Begum Himu -Vs - Masuma Begum and another
Rule is discharged
10
Md. Abdul Khalek alias Malek and others -Vs - Md. Golam Mostafa and anothers
Disposed of
11
Sirajul Islam -Vs- Md. Ruhul Amin and others
Rule is Discharged
12
Chittoranjan Pal and others -Vs - Sheikh Emran and others
Disposed of
13
Md. Habibur Rahman - Vs- Akramul Haque Chowdhury and others
Disposed of
14
Md. Alimuddin -Vs- Md A. Jalil and others
Disposed of
15
Moklesa and others -Vs- Hazi Md. Rafiqul Islam and others
Rule is discharged
16
Md. Abu Sayed Mia. -Vs- Mahfuza Khatun and others
Express reference to Talab-i-mowasibat is necessary when the second demand, namely Talab-i-ishhad, is made. The Rules of Mohammadan law provide that the formalities are to be strictly performed by the preemptor. the preemptor-opposite party has failed to discharge his onus of proof and the trial Court below in the observation and findings on the basis of evidences on records, rightly held that the deed-in-question is purely a deed of exchange not a sub-kabala and as such it is not pre-emptable under the ambit of Section 236 of the Mohammadan Law.
17
Farid Ahmed vs the state and another
18
Md. Ismail and others-Vs-Anwara Begum being dead her legal heirs; Md. Mofizur Rahman and others
Discharged
19
Government and others Vs. Mohammad Salimuddin and others
Dismissed
20
Sufia Begum and others Vs. Nazrul Islam being dead his legal heirs Farida Nasrin and others
Appeal is disposed of.
21
A.K.M. Shafiqur Rahman vs. The State and another
Disposed of
22
Anwar Miah vs. Md. Hamdu Miah and others
Discharged
23
Abdul Jabber Tarek Vs. Amulya Kumar Dutta @ Amulaya Chandra Dutta and others
Appeal is dismissed.
24
Md. Manik Vs. The State
25
BUREAU VERITAS (BIVAC) Bangladesh Limited -Versus- Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others
The Rule issued in all writ petitions are made absolute
26
Md. Afaz Uddin and others Vs- Mst. Jubeda Khatun and others
The Rule is disposed of. The learned Assistant Judge, Goforgaon, Mymensingh is hereby directed to dispose of Title Suit No. 113 of 2020 as early as possible if, in the meantime, same is not otherwise disposed of and both the parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of possession of the suit land till disposal of the suit.
27
Muhibur Rahman and another -Vs- Mst. Rasheda Akhter and another
Onus in a suit for declaring a Heba-bil-ewaz deed in favour of the defendant was forged, and without consideration, the initial onus was upon the plaintiff. The plaintiff, having discharged that onus, is shifted on the defendant to prove that there was the intention of making the heba-bil-ewaz and that the consideration was paid. The onus of proving the formalities in connection with the deed is upon the person who upholds the transaction. The defence side wants the courts to believe that the sale deed Ext.2, the basis of Ext. A is a bonafide document for valuable consideration, but no evidence in this regard having been adduced, the said Ext. cannot be allowed to stand. The minor discrepancy in deposition of a witness, which is an irrelevant point, has not impacted the trustworthiness of the witness.
28
Md. Yakub Ali @ Yakub Hossain and others Vs. Hasan Ali Bhuiyan
29
Md. A. Khalek Vs. Md. Belayet Gazi being dead his heirs- Mohammad Nesar Uddin Gazi
30
R.M. Carton Limited- Versus- The Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Zone-6, Segunbagicha, Dhaka-1000
the reference application is rejected as being incompetent
31
Md. Mamun Ahmed -Versus- Government of Bangladesh and others
The Rule is disposed of
32
The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, ICD, Kamlapur, Dhaka -Versus- Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others
The Rule is made absolute
33
Md. Akkas Ali alias Mohammad Ali -Versus- The Artha Rin Adalat No. 2, Dhaka and another
The Rule is discharged
34
Kalipada Das -Versus- Commissioner of Customs, Custom House, Chittagong and others
Rule is disposed of
35
Abdul Monaf Khandakar and another -Versus- Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule discharged and application rejected
36
Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram -Versus- Customs, Excise
Appeal Allowed and directed to make assessment
37
Md. Shohidul Islam Biddut and another -vs- Sultan Ahammod
Commissioner to confine his inquiry to the points asked for and report on them only without under-taking other work at the request of the parties-Court not at precluded from considering the Commissioner`s report afresh again in the light of fresh materials-Brought in the record by the parties mere acceptance of report should not give apprehension in the mind of the litigant.
38
Dinesh Chandra Shaha and another-Vs-Md. Mobarak Hossain and others
Discharged
39
Gobindha Mridha and others Vs. Md. Kamal Moral and others
40
Md. Mahabubur Rahman Talukder vs- Md. Oli Ullah (Oannu)
Rule is disposed of without any order as to cost. The learned Senior Assistant Judge, Kalapara, Patuakhali is hereby directed to dispose of Civil Suit No 1272 of 2021 as early as possible preferably within 06 (six) months from the date of receipt of this judgment and order and the parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of possession of the suit land till disposal of the suit.
41
Maizuddin Sikdar alias Mazid-Vs-Azer Mondal being dead his legal hires: 1(a) Khalil Rahman and others
Absolute
42
Md. Abdul Latif Hawlader being dead his legal heirs; 1(a) Nure Fatematul Jannat and others-Vs-Md. Badsha Miah and others
Absolute
43
Kanu Das and another Vs- Rahul Dutta and others
Absolute
44
Abdus Salam Vs. The State
46
Dabiruddin Mondal being dead his legal heirs: 1. Md. Mosharraf Hossain and others-Vs-Sree Dinesh Chandra Shaha and another
Absolute
47
Shamima Akhter and others vs the State
48
Md. Manik Mal @ Abdul Gani Mal being dead his legal heirs: 1(a) Md. Iqbal Mal and others-Vs-Md. Abul Kalam Azad Patari and others
Discharged
49
Government of Bangladesh Vs.Most. Anowara Begum
50
Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Gazipur and others Vs. Md. Kamal Khan
Appeal is dismissed.
This Site is Visited :