|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
1 |
Criminal Misc 20224/2023
(Criminal Misc 20224/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 10 |
Ripon Roy alias Ripon Chandra Roy vs. the State and another |
Discharged |
|
2 |
Criminal Misc 60027/2019
(Criminal Misc 60027/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-MAY-25
From : Bijoy 71 Building Court No. 4 (3rd Floor) |
Abul Hossain Vs Mst. Aleya Begum alias Alo and others |
|
|
3 |
Criminal Misc 46614/2022
(Criminal Misc 46614/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-MAY-25
From : Bijoy 71 Building Court No. 4 (3rd Floor) |
Farid Khan Vs. The State and others |
|
|
4 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 2633/2025
(Criminal Appeal(H) 2633/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
Md. Billal Hosen Vs. The State |
|
|
5 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 2807/2025
(Criminal Revision (TN) 2807/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
Abul Bashar Vs. The State |
|
|
6 |
Civil Revision 2824/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-MAY-25
From : Bijoy 71 Building Court No. 2 (3rd Floor) |
Abdul Hamid being dead, his heirs Md. Monju Miah and others -Vs- Md. Siddique Miah being dead, his heirs Kolpona Khatun and others |
The homestead of an owner in a rural area is exempted from all legal processes, rather than in order to get such protection, the homestead must be in a rural area as per the proviso so enumerated in section 6 of the land reform Ordinance 1984. Any person, who is in possession of a homestead, will be an `owner` and enjoy the protection under the Ordinance. |
|
7 |
First Misc Appeal 166/1999
(First Misc Appeal 166/1999)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 07-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 18 |
The Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Md. Kamruzzmaan Khan and others |
Appeal is disposed of. |
|
8 |
Civil Revision 1255/2020
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 07-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 30 |
Jewel Mir (Jhatan) and others ... Plaintiffs-Applicants-Petitioners. -VersusEnglish Pressbritarian Church, represented by the Church of Bangladesh Mission and others ... Defendants-Opposite parties- opposite parties |
The rule is discharged |
|
9 |
Civil Revision 13/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 19 |
Laila Arjuman Banu (Laila) Vs. Md. Rafiur Rahman Khan (Saikat) and others. |
Discharged. |
|
10 |
Civil Revision 1850/2023
(Civil Revision 1850/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 30 |
Complete Education for alternative development (CEFAD) foundation. .... Petitioner -VersusInternational leasing and financial services limited and others ....Opposite-parties |
Absolute |
|
11 |
Criminal Misc 15604/2018
(Criminal Misc 15604/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 14 |
Monwar Sadat and another -vs - The State and another |
Discharged |
|
12 |
Death Reference 94/2016
(Death Reference 94/2016)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 14 |
The State -vs- Sajib Khan and others |
A) Death Reference No. 94 of 2016 is rejected;
B) Criminal Appeal No. 6881 of 2016, Criminal Appeal No. 6937 of 2016, Jail Appeal No. 253 of 2016, Jail Appeal No. 254 of 2016, and Jail Appeal No. 47 of 2017 are dismissed with modification of the sentences. The Rule issued in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 6859 of 2017 is discharged. The conviction and sentences of death as awarded to condemned prisoners Sajib Khan, Sakil Miah, and Imran under section 8 of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 are commuted to imprisonment for life. The conviction and sentences of death and fine of Taka 1,00,000/- each as awarded to them under section 302 of the Penal Code are also commuted to imprisonment for life. The other order of conviction and sentence of 7 years under section 201 of the Penal Code will remain as before. All the sentences will run concurrently. These convicts should be shifted from the condemned cell to the normal cell at once.
C) Criminal Appeal No. 6901 of 2016 and Jail Appeal No. 255 of 2016 are allowed in part. Jail Appeal No. 256 of 2016 is allowed. The conviction and sentence of death and fine of taka 1,00,000/- as awarded to condemned prisoners Samim Osman and Rubel Miah under section 8 of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 are set aside. The conviction and sentence of 7 years under section 201 of the Penal Code as awarded to Appellant No. 1 Samim Osman is hereby upheld and confirmed. This convict-appellant be shifted from the condemned cell to the normal cell at once. Appellant No. 2 Rubel Miah is found not guilty of the charge leveled against him and he is acquitted of all the charges. The condemned prisoner Rubel Miah be set at liberty if not wanted in any other case. |
|
13 |
Arbitration Appeal 16/2023
(Arbitration Appeal 16/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 30 |
Rupayan Housing Estate Limited … Appellant -VersusHazi Mohammad Mustafa Zaman …Respondent |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
14 |
First Appeal 69/2021
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 30 |
Mst. Sahara Begum … Defendant-Appellant. -VersusMd. Abdul Mannan and others …Plaintiffs-Respondents. |
The appeal is dismissed |
|
15 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 2511/2025
(Criminal Revision (TN) 2511/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
Md. Alal Biswas Vs. The State |
|
|
16 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 5465/2015
(Criminal Appeal(H) 5465/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
Mst. Sahanara Begum @ Bulu -Versus- The State |
|
|
17 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 3859/2023
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-MAY-25
From : Bijoy 71 Building Court No. 32 (10th Floor) |
Posritosh sarker alias Poritosh Roy vs The State |
|
|
18 |
Civil Revision 3740/2010
(Civil Revision 3740/2010)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 03-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 20 |
Md. Hashem Hawlader being dead his heirs- Md. Khalilur Rahman Howlader and others Vs. Abdul Berik Fakir and others |
|
|
19 |
Civil Revision 1824/2022
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 03-MAY-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 20 |
Saleha Begum and others Vs. Md. Mosharaf Hossain and others |
|
|
20 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 2401/2025
(Criminal Appeal(H) 2401/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
Mizanur Rahman vs the state |
|
|
21 |
Civil Revision 2718/2021
(Civil Revision 2718/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 17 |
Hasna Bewa alias Hameda and others vs Md. Layeb Uddin being dead his legal heirs Mst. Zorina Bewa and others |
DISCHARGED |
|
22 |
Civil Revision 1357/2024
(Civil Revision 1357/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 17 |
Alhaj Advocate Rebeka Sultana Daiji and another vs Shah Newaj Ibne Mustaque and others |
Disposed of |
|
23 |
Civil Revision 82/2011
(Civil Revision 82/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 17 |
Al Hajj Mostafizur Rahman Miah vs Radhe Sham Datta |
ABSOLUTE |
|
24 |
Civil Revision 79/2011
(Civil Revision 79/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 17 |
Al Hajj Mostafizur Rahman Miah vs Radhe Sham Datta and others |
ABSOLUTE |
|
25 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 2105/2025
(Criminal Appeal(H) 2105/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
A.T.M. Aminul Islam @ Babu Vs. The State |
|
|
26 |
First Appeal 11/2023
(First Appeal 11/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 29-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 18 |
Ainuddin Haider |
|
|
27 |
Criminal Misc (TN) 18704/2025
(Criminal Misc (TN) 18704/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 29-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 14 |
Raju Ahmed vs- The State and another |
The issue as raised by the petitioner is not a res integra. Our apex Court settled the issue in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said case, convicts under section 138 of the NI Act, without depositing 50% of the total amount of the respective cheques, filed applications under section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be released on bail to enable them to present an appeal. The said applications were rejected. Against the orders, the convicts filed Criminal Revision Nos. 3178, 3180, and 3179 of 2024 and obtained Rule and they were also enlarged on bail. Complainants of the cases preferred Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeals our apex Court held that section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not contradictory with the provision of section 138A of the NI Act, rather the provision of section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure will be applicable subject to fulfillment of condition stipulated under section 138A of the NI Act i.e. subject to deposit 50% of the total amount of the cheque.
Therefore, we are of the view that the trial court rightly passed the impugned order rejecting the bail application of the petitioner and we do not find any reason to interfere with the same.
Hence, the application is rejected summarily. |
|
28 |
Criminal Misc (TN) 18740/2025
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 29-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 14 |
Raju Ahmed -Vs- The State and another |
The issue as raised by the petitioner is not a res integra. Our apex Court settled the issue in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said case, convicts under section 138 of the NI Act, without depositing 50% of the total amount of the respective cheques, filed applications under section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be released on bail to enable them to present an appeal. The said applications were rejected. Against the orders, the convicts filed Criminal Revision Nos. 3178, 3180, and 3179 of 2024 and obtained Rule and they were also enlarged on bail. Complainants of the cases preferred Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeals our apex Court held that section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not contradictory with the provision of section 138A of the NI Act, rather the provision of section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure will be applicable subject to fulfillment of condition stipulated under section 138A of the NI Act i.e. subject to deposit 50% of the total amount of the cheque.
Therefore, we are of the view that the trial court rightly passed the impugned order rejecting the bail application of the petitioner and we do not find any reason to interfere with the same.
Hence, the application is rejected summarily. |
|
29 |
Civil Revision (TN) 3909/2016
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Main Building Court No. 13 |
Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Mymensingh and another -Vs-Swapan Kumar Sen Gupta and others |
Absolute |
|
30 |
Civil Revision 3228/2008
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Main Building Court No. 13 |
Md. Motaleb Khalifa @ Md. Abdul Motaleb Khalifa and others-Vs-Md. Akbar Ali Khalifa and others |
Absolute |
|
31 |
Civil Revision 380/2018
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Main Building Court No. 13 |
Most. Rahima Begum being dead her heirs; Most. Mahmuda Begum and others -Vs-Mohammad Ali Sardar and others |
Absolute |
|
32 |
Civil Revision 805/2015
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Main Building Court No. 13 |
Gulshana Jannat-Vs-Hasiba Bibi and others |
Absolute |
|
33 |
Civil Revision 1953/2024
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Main Building Court No. 13 |
Md. Shahidul Islam Khandoker and others-Vs-Hajera Begum |
Absolute |
|
34 |
Civil Revision 5925/2022
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Bijoy 71 Building Court No. 2 (3rd Floor) |
Yasmin and others. -Vs- Kolim Ullah and others |
The record of rights is not a document of title. It does not create or extinguish title to land. |
|
35 |
Civil Revision 937/2018
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Main Building Court No. 13 |
Md. Abu Bokkor Pramanik-Vs-Md. Abdur Rashid and others |
Discharged |
|
36 |
Civil Revision 927/2018
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Main Building Court No. 13 |
Md. Abu Bokkor Pramanik-Vs-Md. Abdur Rashid and others |
Discharged |
|
37 |
Civil Revision 1557/2020
(Civil Revision 1557/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 17 |
Principal, Sokina Azahar Technical College and Secretary, Managing Committee vs. Dhali Rabiuzzaman Khan and others |
|
|
38 |
Civil Revision 2723/2021
(Civil Revision 2723/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 17 |
Md. Saidul Islam ........ Petitioner -Versus- Mosammet Sharmin Akhter Bithi .... Opposite party |
|
|
39 |
Civil Revision 3109/1998
(Civil Revision 3109/1998)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 17 |
Nasiruddin Ahmed Chowdhury vs. Akter Ali being dead his legal heirs Jabeda Khatun and others |
DISCHARGED |
|
40 |
Civil Revision 369/1998
(Civil Revision 369/1998)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 17 |
Jasim Uddin and others vs Mohammed Ullah being dead his legal heirs Md. Abu Taher and others |
ABSOLUTE |
|
41 |
Civil Revision 1336/2008
(Civil Revision No. 1336 of 2008)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 5 |
Md. Azizur Rahman and others-vs-Government of Bangladesh and others |
Disposed of with observations. |
|
42 |
Civil Revision 2528/2021
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-APR-25
From : Bijoy 71 Building Court No. 2 (3rd Floor) |
Lutfun Nesa -Vs- Feli Nessa and others. |
A person, if not authorise by the plaintiff or defendant, except husband and wife, could not depose on his behalf in the Court, if depose, he would be treated as incompetent witness. ‘‘In a suit for partition the co-sharers are necessary parties in the sense that in the absence of any such co-sharer the Judgment which will be given in such a suit may be rendered infructuous at the option of the excluded party.’’ |
|
43 |
Criminal Misc (TN) 1517/2025
(Criminal Misc (TN) 1517/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 24-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 14 |
Debangshu Kumar Sarkar Vs- The state |
Disposed of. The office is directed to communicate a copy of the order to the learned Judge, Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No.1, Rangpur to take necessary steps to transmit the case record of Nari-O-Shishu case being No.37 of 2022 to Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No.2, Rangpur for expeditious trial and disposal. The office is also directed to communicate a copy of the order to the learned Judge, Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No. 2, Rangpur to take necessary steps as per the direction given herein above. |
|
44 |
In re /2025
(In re (TN) 2398/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 24-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
Md. Zahid @ Dyle Zahid vs the state |
|
|
45 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 2041/2025
(Criminal Appeal(H) 2041/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
Alal Hossain Khan and another Vs. The State |
|
|
46 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 2488/2025
(Criminal Revision (TN) 2488/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 7 |
Asraful Alom Khan Vs. The State and another |
|
|
47 |
Civil Revision 720/2022
(Civil Revision 720/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 18 |
Mrs. Afsana Barik Malik Vs. Zakaria Hossain Chowdhury and others |
Rule is discharged. |
|
48 |
Civil Revision 652/2002
(Civil Revision 652/2002)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 18 |
Giasuddin and another Vs. Most. Jahura Akter and others |
Rule is discharged. |
|
49 |
First Appeal 693/2019
(First Appeal 693/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 18 |
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Jamal Mia and others |
Appeal is dismissed. |
|
50 |
First Misc Appeal 205/1999
(First Misc Appeal 205/1999)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-25
From : Annex Building Court No. 18 |
M/S Sultan Bai Oil Mills Ltd. Vs. Branch Manager, Pubali Bank, Shaheb Bazar Branch and others |
Appeal is dismissed. |
