Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Government of the people`s Republic of Bangladesh and others Vs. Shahadat Hossain and another
2
Govt. of Bangladehs Vs. Mst. Hamida Khan Rozi and others
Appeal is dismissed.
3
Md. Hossen Mullik and others Vs. Md. Aminul Mullik and others
4
The State Vs. Md. Shah Alam
Rejected
5
A. Wahab Mia and others .... Petitioners -VersusMostak Bepari and another ....Opposite-parties
6
Noor Begum and others … Plaintiffs-Appellants. -VersusTahera Begum and others …Defendants-Respondents.
7
Md. Nazim Imtiaz --- Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. -VersusDilshad Shobnom --- Plaintiff-Respondent-Opposite party.
8
Ishrat Amin Vs.Md. Shahjahan Miah alias Majnu Miah and others
In the event of violation of a decree of permanent injunction, the decree is enforceable by taking recourse to the provision of Order XXI rule 32(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure and not by a fresh suit but where willful disobedience of the order of injunction is alleged, such violation must be proved by cogent, independent and reliable evidence and the Court must be satisfied upon inquiry and on consideration of the materials on record before passing order under Order XXI rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure that the judgment-debtor has willfully disobeyed or violated injunction in defiance of the majesty of law. If violation is proved, the decree of permanent injunction can be executed by attachment of the property or putting the judgment debtor in civil imprisonment or by both or directing the judgment-debtor for making delivery of possession of the dispossessed property in favour of the decree-holder.
9
Hairsadhan Samaddar and another vs. Govt of BD and ors
The name of the petitioners are recorded in the Draft Khatian (DP)
10
Mst. Firoza Khatun and others vs. Govt of BD
a specific allotment of 3 (three)Khata of plots in favor of the petitioners in the project namely "extended Uttara 3rd part project residential area".
11
Kiron Mondol and others Vs. Palash Mondol and others
12
Md. Ziaul Haque Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance.
Discharged
13
Mosammat Joynob Bibi alias Moroni Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka
Absolute
14
Afroza Begum being dead her heirs: Md. Monir (dead) and others Vs. M. A. Quddus Shaikh and others.
Disposed of
15
Manik Barua and others Vs. Bijoy Mondol and others.
Disposed of
16
Md. Abu Taleb and others Vs. Aziz Reza and others.
Disposed of
17
Mohammed Rejaul Kader and others Vs. Enayet Ullah
Disposed of
18
Md. Moneam hossain vs the state and another
19
Md. Kowsar and others....…Petitioners (In Writ petition No. 2283 of 2020) Md. Mahtab Uddin and other ...........Petitioners (In Writ Petition No. 15115 of 2017) -V E R S U S- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development and Co-operatives, Local Government Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others......Respondents
Service Matter. Palli Sonchoy Bank
20
Md. Jakir Hossain and others ...Petitioners-V E R S U S- Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operative, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others.…….Respondents
Service Matter. Palli Sonchoy Bank
21
Md. Abdul Quddus Makhan -Vs - The state
Discharged
22
23
Md. Abdul Aziz Prang being dead his legal heirs Shahton Begum Meher Neka and others vs. Abdul Gafur Prang and others
ABSOLUTE
24
The State -Vs- Md.Shah Alam
Rejected
25
26
Abdul Basit and another vs. Tahmina Akter Koli
Guardianship of minor child
27
Md. Bachchu Mia Vs. Md. Shah Alam and others
28
Md. Bachchu Mia Vs. Md. Shah Alam and others
29
Nitai Chandra Arjya and another .... Petitioners -Versus- Santosh Chandra Arjya and others .…Opposite parties
30
Peoples Insurance Company Limited, represented by its Chief Executive Officer (In charge) and another -Versus- Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Bank and Financial Institutions Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, Segunbagicha, Ramna, Dhaka and others
31
The State vs. Md. Khalil
Accepted
32
Md. Nizam Uddin @ Md. Nejam Uddin -Versus- The State and another
33
Sheikh Ekram Hossain (Jahid) and another -Vs- Most. Saleha Khatun, being dead, her heirs: Sheikh Shamsul Alam and others
The appellate court, as the final court of the finding of facts, affirms the trial court`s Judgment on a proper assessment of evidence on record, there is no misreading of material evidence, and the findings do not suffer from any error of law.
34
Omar Ali -Vs- Sree Kartik Chgandra Sarker and another
An ex-parte judgment and decree can be set aside on two grounds: (I) that the summons was not duly served or (II) that any sufficient cause prevented him from appearing when the suit was called on for hearing.
35
Dr. Rajib Kumar Goswami and another -Vs- Md. Al Mamun Kha
The foundation for the exercise of the power under this rule is the fulfilment of the two requirements of rule 21 of Order 11 of the Code. The first is the failure of the interrogated party to comply with any order to answer the interrogatory, and the second is the interrogatoring party applying to the court to impose the penalty.
36
Mojibul Hoque vs the state and another
37
Anwar Hosssain vs the state and another
38
Md. Ashraf Ali Khan, son of late Abdul Latif and another.-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka, Collectorate Bhaban, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Dhaka and others.
Dismissed
39
Md. Fokruzzaman Topu vs the state
40
Md. Bashir Ahmed Versus Nasima Akter and Others
41
Badiul Alam Dobash being dead, his heir: 1(a)-Wahedul Alam Dobash -Vs- Jarina Khatun being dead, her heirs: 1(a) Lutfunnessa and others
The provision of section 50 of the Waqfs Ordinance, 1962, in an unambiguous term, vested authority upon the Administrator of Waqfs to decide title and ownership of a property to be waqf property like an ordinary civil court with the help of evidence or other materials on record while releasing the same from the waqf estate but without doing so, the Administrator of Waqfs undersigned by the Deputy Administrator in a very cursory refused to entertain the application of the respondent.
42
Md. Haidar Kamal and others Vs. Md. Fariduddin and others
43
44
Md. Jamal Uddin Vs. Most. Tahmina Akhter and others
45
Abdul Barek, son of late Abdul Hamid of village- Sataish, Police Station- Tongi, District- Gazipur.-Vs-Md. Abdul Kadir and others.
Allowed
46
Begum Khaleda Zia VS The state
Rule absolute
47
Begum Khaleda Zia VS The state
Rule absolute
48
Md. Nader Ali Vs. The State and another
49
Md. Abdul Hannan Vs. S.M. Nazmul Huq and another
50
Md. Rafique Ahmed -Versus- The State and another
 
This Site is Visited :