Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Mohammad Mojammel Hoque Vs. Mohammad Hosan and others
2
Halim Sikder alias Abdul Halim Vs. The government of Bangladesh and others
Absolute
3
Alhaz Sekander Ali Khan Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others
Absolute
4
Mrs. Zearantun Nessa Vs. Md. Abul Kalam and others
5
Bangladesh Shilpa Bank, Head Office, Shilpa Bank Bhaban, Dhaka Vs. Al-haj Sayedur Nessa and others
6
Prokaushal Projukti and M/S. Quashem Construction (JV), Dhaka Vs. The Executive Engineer, Local Government Engineering Department (LGED), Rangpur, LGED Building, Dhaap Road, Rangpur and others
7
Mossa. Rabea Bosri Vs. Iqbal Hossain Sheikh
8
9
Globe Ocean Pte. Ltd. Vs. M.V. TELERIG
Application for vacating the order of arrest is allowed.
10
Alhaz Mohammd Mohe Uddin, President, Bangladesh Jatiotabadi Dol (BNP), Homna Upazilla Unit, Comilla, son of Md. Abdul Latif of Village- Shrimuddi Poschim Para, Post Office- Homna, Police Station- Homna, District- Comilla and others.-Vs-Bangladesh Election Commission represented by the Chief Election Commissioner, Bangladesh Election Commission Secretariat, Nirbachan Bhaban, Plot No. E-14/Z, Agargaon, Dhaka-1207 and others.
Absolute
11
Golam Mowla Chowdhury @ Golam Mowla being dead his legal heirs Jahanara Begum and others vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
discharged
12
The State -Versus- Selina Akter (Absconding) and another
Rejected; the sentence of death is commuted to imprisonment for life.
13
Mohammad Hossain vs. Mafzal Ahmed and another
discharged
14
Shah Mahmud Hasan Chowdhury alias Md. Mahmudul Hasan, Official Matowalli Porsha High Madrasa Waqfa Estate, Porsha, Naogaon vs Govt and others
15
Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Chattogram. -Vs- Mst. Safa Khatun died, leaving behind the legal heirs: Mohammad Shah Alam and others
A simple suit for a declaration of title without any prayer for consequential relief is not maintainable. Unless a document is proved in accordance with law, such a document cannot be admitted into evidence forming the basis of a decree. Mere filing of a document is not sufficient to satisfy the requirement of law.
16
Ataur Rahman vs Govt. and others
17
Mohammad Kamal Udddin -Versus- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka, and others
18
Bir Muktijoddha late Md. Sahadat Hossain on his behalf wife Aleya Begum Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others
Rule is made absolute
19
Md. Yeaj Uddin Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is discharged
20
Hridoy Mohan Shil and others … Pre-emptors-Respondents-Petitioners -Vs- Juni Bala Shil being dead her heirs Shomvo Charan Sharma and others ... Pre-emptee-Appellant-Opposite parties
The Rule is discharged
21
Juni Bala Shill, being dead, her heir Shomvo Charan Sharma ... Vendor-Opposite Party –Appellant-Petitioner. -Vs- Hridoy Mohan Shil and others … Pre-emptors-Respondents-Opposite Parties.
The rule is made absolute
22
Md. Liakat Hossain vs. Md. Younus Ali Hawlader and others
Rule is discharged
23
Rajdhani Unnayan Katripakkha (RAJUK) Vs Md. Shahid Ullah and another
24
Panmark Impex PIE Ltd. Vs. A.M. ACCORD and others
application rejected, auction confirmed and time extended
25
Md. Alomgir being dead his legal heirs; (a) Ms. Shova Alom and others vs. Banani Property Development Limited, represented by its Managing Director and others
Absolute
26
Md. Ismael Hossein alias Jhontu Karmaker Vs. The Chairman, Jatio Muktijoddha Council and others
Rule is made absolute.
27
Md. Mojibor Rahman VS. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Liberation War Afairs
Rule is made Absolute.
28
Md. Tofazzal Hossain Bhuiyan alias Tofazzal Hossain Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
The Rule is made Absolute.
29
Mohammad Arman Ali Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Religious Affairs and Others
Rule is discharged as being in-fructuous.
30
Md. Abdul Kadir being dead his legal heirs: Mst. Sona Banu and others versus Md. Amanulla and others
Allowed
31
Md. Rasel Akon -Versus- The State
32
Md. Gias Mahmud -Versus- The State and another
33
A.K.M. Anower Hossain Vs. Most. Badrunnesa (Aleya) and others
34
Ahad Ali Biswas vs. Samsur Rahman and others
Absolute
35
Md. Amzad Hossain alias Amzad Ali, -Versus- Md. Rafiqul Islam and others.
Discharged
36
Samir Uddin. -Versus- Anowar Ali and others.
37
Gopal Chandra Debnath. -Versus- Rakhal Chandra Debnath being dead his legal heirs Raton Dev Nath and others.
Discharged
38
Md. Khairul Islam Lebu. -Versus- Mrs. Rupali Akter Rupa and another.
Discharged
39
Md. Zalal Uddin Bhuiyan -Vs- Md. Samim Uddin Bhuiyan and others
The Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that an ex parte decree can be set aside on two grounds: (I) that the summons was not duly served or (II) that any sufficient cause prevented him from appearing when the suit was called on for hearing.
40
Sub-rule 2 of rule 9 of Order 22 of the code allows an abatement to be set aside despite a delay in making an application in time if it can be shown that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from continuing the action. At the same time, section 5 of the Limitation Act has been specifically made applicable to the condonation of delay. As a logical sequel, an abetment can be set aside at any time, even beyond the period prescribed for making an application in that behalf if sufficient cause is shown to explain the delay. when there has already been a decree determining the rights of the parties, finally, there is no question of any right to sue surviving. If the right to sue has already culminated and merged into a decree of the Court, and the Suit has also come to an end to that extent, then the terms of Order 22, rule 3 or 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure are not at all applicable.
41
Md. Ruhul Amin Khandokar and others-Vs-Sarafat Ali being dead his legal heirs; 1(a) Renuara Begum and others
Absolute
42
Md. Showkat Ali Sardar Vs. Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, and Artha Rin Adalat, Naogaon and others.
Discharged.
43
Shafiqul Islam Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others.
Discharged
44
Sachindananda Sen Gupta ,FCA VS. Secretary, Ministry of Land and others.
Absolute
45
South Atlantic Shipping Ltd., Owners of the vessel M.V. S. Atlantic. ............ Plaintiff -VERSUS- Honour Ship Management Ltd. and others. .....…Defendants
46
Shapoorji Pallonji Forbes Shipping Limited. ............ Plaintiff -VERSUS- Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock and others. .....…Defendants
47
Md. Ashique Hossain Asha ... Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner. -Versus- Mosa. Kaniz Fatima Tumpa ... Plaintiff-Appellant-Opposite party.
The Rule is discharged
48
Mst. Rijiya Begum and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is made absolute.
49
Md. Nur Alam and others Vs. Most. Shamsun Nahar being dead her legal heirs- Md. Nurul Iman Dula and others
50
Ayesha Begum and others ... Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners -Vs- Mohammad Hanif and others … Defendants-Respondents-Opposite Parties
The rule is made absolute
This Site is Visited :