Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Ainuddin Haider
2
Raju Ahmed vs- The State and another
The issue as raised by the petitioner is not a res integra. Our apex Court settled the issue in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said case, convicts under section 138 of the NI Act, without depositing 50% of the total amount of the respective cheques, filed applications under section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be released on bail to enable them to present an appeal. The said applications were rejected. Against the orders, the convicts filed Criminal Revision Nos. 3178, 3180, and 3179 of 2024 and obtained Rule and they were also enlarged on bail. Complainants of the cases preferred Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeals our apex Court held that section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not contradictory with the provision of section 138A of the NI Act, rather the provision of section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure will be applicable subject to fulfillment of condition stipulated under section 138A of the NI Act i.e. subject to deposit 50% of the total amount of the cheque. Therefore, we are of the view that the trial court rightly passed the impugned order rejecting the bail application of the petitioner and we do not find any reason to interfere with the same. Hence, the application is rejected summarily.
3
Raju Ahmed -Vs- The State and another
The issue as raised by the petitioner is not a res integra. Our apex Court settled the issue in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said case, convicts under section 138 of the NI Act, without depositing 50% of the total amount of the respective cheques, filed applications under section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be released on bail to enable them to present an appeal. The said applications were rejected. Against the orders, the convicts filed Criminal Revision Nos. 3178, 3180, and 3179 of 2024 and obtained Rule and they were also enlarged on bail. Complainants of the cases preferred Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeals our apex Court held that section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not contradictory with the provision of section 138A of the NI Act, rather the provision of section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure will be applicable subject to fulfillment of condition stipulated under section 138A of the NI Act i.e. subject to deposit 50% of the total amount of the cheque. Therefore, we are of the view that the trial court rightly passed the impugned order rejecting the bail application of the petitioner and we do not find any reason to interfere with the same. Hence, the application is rejected summarily.
4
Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Mymensingh and another -Vs-Swapan Kumar Sen Gupta and others
Absolute
5
Md. Motaleb Khalifa @ Md. Abdul Motaleb Khalifa and others-Vs-Md. Akbar Ali Khalifa and others
Absolute
6
Most. Rahima Begum being dead her heirs; Most. Mahmuda Begum and others -Vs-Mohammad Ali Sardar and others
Absolute
7
Gulshana Jannat-Vs-Hasiba Bibi and others
Absolute
8
Md. Shahidul Islam Khandoker and others-Vs-Hajera Begum
Absolute
9
Yasmin and others. -Vs- Kolim Ullah and others
The record of rights is not a document of title. It does not create or extinguish title to land.
10
Md. Abu Bokkor Pramanik-Vs-Md. Abdur Rashid and others
Discharged
11
Md. Abu Bokkor Pramanik-Vs-Md. Abdur Rashid and others
Discharged
12
Principal, Sokina Azahar Technical College and Secretary, Managing Committee vs. Dhali Rabiuzzaman Khan and others
13
Md. Saidul Islam ........ Petitioner -Versus- Mosammet Sharmin Akhter Bithi .... Opposite party
14
Nasiruddin Ahmed Chowdhury vs. Akter Ali being dead his legal heirs Jabeda Khatun and others
DISCHARGED
15
Jasim Uddin and others vs Mohammed Ullah being dead his legal heirs Md. Abu Taher and others
ABSOLUTE
16
Md. Azizur Rahman and others-vs-Government of Bangladesh and others
Disposed of with observations.
17
Lutfun Nesa -Vs- Feli Nessa and others.
A person, if not authorise by the plaintiff or defendant, except husband and wife, could not depose on his behalf in the Court, if depose, he would be treated as incompetent witness. ‘‘In a suit for partition the co-sharers are necessary parties in the sense that in the absence of any such co-sharer the Judgment which will be given in such a suit may be rendered infructuous at the option of the excluded party.’’
18
Debangshu Kumar Sarkar Vs- The state
Disposed of. The office is directed to communicate a copy of the order to the learned Judge, Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No.1, Rangpur to take necessary steps to transmit the case record of Nari-O-Shishu case being No.37 of 2022 to Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No.2, Rangpur for expeditious trial and disposal. The office is also directed to communicate a copy of the order to the learned Judge, Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No. 2, Rangpur to take necessary steps as per the direction given herein above.
19
Md. Zahid @ Dyle Zahid vs the state
20
Alal Hossain Khan and another Vs. The State
21
Asraful Alom Khan Vs. The State and another
22
Mrs. Afsana Barik Malik Vs. Zakaria Hossain Chowdhury and others
Rule is discharged.
23
Giasuddin and another Vs. Most. Jahura Akter and others
Rule is discharged.
24
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Jamal Mia and others
Appeal is dismissed.
25
M/S Sultan Bai Oil Mills Ltd. Vs. Branch Manager, Pubali Bank, Shaheb Bazar Branch and others
Appeal is dismissed.
26
Md. Farid Ali Vs. Mrs. Nurjahan Begum
Rule is discharged.
27
Md. Nurul Huda Vs- The State and another
Rule Discharged
28
Md. Nurul Huda Vs- The State and another
Rule Discharged
29
Md. Nurul Huda Vs- The state and another
Rule Discharged
30
Shaharavanu being dead, her legal heirs: Md. Habib Mir @ Mir Habibur Rahman and others. -Vs- Sheikh Humayun Kabir and others.
An ex parte decree can also be set aside by a regular suit if it is provided that there was suppression of summons and the defendant was prevented from defending the suit by reason of fraud.
31
Md. Khabiruddin Howlader
32
Md. Taizuddin Molla being dead his heirs- Mst. Nesaron Nesa and others Vs. Md. Hemayet Hossen being dead his heirs- Shamima Akter and others
33
Nasima Begum Vs. Most. Anowara Begum and others
34
Md. Azahar Ullah Bhuiyan vs. The State
Disposed of
35
Sk. Md. Morshed vs. The State
Disposed of
36
Senior Advocate Z.I. Khan Panna vs. The State
Disposed of
37
K.M. Hamidur Rahman vs. Dhaka Power Distribution Company Ltd.(DPDC), Dhaka and the State
Discharged
38
Mirza Saifur Rahman -Versus- The State and another
39
Md. Rafique Ahmed -Versus- The State and another
40
Md. Nazrul Islam and another vs. Abdul Jalil and others
Absolute
41
Md. Mostafizur Rahman and another vs. Md. Bazlur Rashid and others
Disposed of
42
The State -Vs- Md. Alamgir Hossain and another.
Rejected
43
M/S Motaleb Iron Store vs. National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
44
M/S Alvi Spinning Mills Limited vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Discharged
45
Fazal Sons Pvt. Ltd. vs. National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
46
M/S Hadid International vs. National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
47
Bagdad Iron Mart vs. National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
48
M/S. Dhaka Iron Store vs. National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
49
Shyampur Iron Store vs. National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
50
Gram Bangla Tubes Ltd. vs. National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
This Site is Visited :