Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
461
Md Abul Kalam Azad Vs. The State and another
462
Md. Saiful Alam Bhuiyan Vs. Md. Shahnor Bhuiyan being dead his legal heirs- Rashida Begum and others
463
The government of Bangladesh and others … Appellants -VersusSayed Rahmatur Bor Ertija Ahsan and others …Respondents
Allowed
464
Dipayan Mondal -Versus- The State and another
465
Md. Azmat Ali Vs. Most. Hosna Banu and others
466
Md. Abdul Ali Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Land, Netrokona and others
467
Md. Saiful islam vs the state
468
Md. Azimel Kadar vs- The state and another
servcie Matter- transfering from one scholl to another one
469
Mahmuda Begum and others Vs. Maifuza Akter and others
470
Md. Abdul Motaleb Hawlader -Vs- Md. Shahadath Hossain being dead, his legal heirs: Khairun Nessa and others.
Muslim law requires no particular formalities for the creation of a Wasiyatnama. It may be made in writing, or oral, or even by gestures. In the case of a written Wasiyatnama, there should be two witnesses to the declaration of Wasiyatnama. However, the intention of the Testator must be unequivocal and unambiguous that the Wasiyatnama is to be executed after his death. Any expression that signifies the Testator`s intention is sufficient to constitute a bequest. In the case of an oral Wasiyatnama, no specific number or class of witnesses is necessary for its validity. However, the following conditions need to be satisfied:- I. Legator`s intention to make a Wasiyatnama must be proved beyond doubt. III. Terms of the Wasiyatnama must be proved III. Wasiyatnama must be proved with the greatest possible exactness. When the Testator fails to mention the quantity or amount of bequeathed property, regard may be given to the number or quantity owned by the Testator at the time of death. Wasiyatnama shall be executed after paying debts and funeral expenses. To confirm a Wasiyatnama executed, there is no essence required by law for filing a probate case by a Muslim.
471
Syed Abdul Aziz @ Chunnu Miah, son of late Syed Nannu Miah of 101/2, Borobagh, Police Station- Mirpur, Dhaka.-Vs-Md. Ansurul Haoqe, son of late Moulovi Mojibul Hoque and others.
Discharged
472
Md. Hafizur Rahman Vs. The State and another
473
Md. Kaium Khan … Appellant-petitioner -VersusJanata Bank Limited and others …Respondents-opposite party
Dismissed
474
Md. Robiul Islam and others Vs. Farida Yeasmin and others.
Disposed of
475
Md. Emdadul Huq Bepari and others Vs. Tofazzel Hossain Bepari being dead his legal heirs_ Lalmon Begum and others
476
Alhaj Md. Sekandar Ali being dead his legal heirs; 1(a) Professor Razia Begum Vs. Soara Tammam and others.
Disposed of
477
Khijim Uddin and others =Versus= Mojnu Muhammed died leaving behind his legal heirs and others
An application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Decree)
478
Md. Imam Hossain =Versus= Nusrat Jahan Rina and another
An application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Decree)
479
Md. Abdul Sobhan Khan died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(a)-1(i) =Versus= Siddiqur Rahman, the defendant No. 1 died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(Ka)-1(Jha) and Ali Akbar, the defendant No. 2 died leaving behind his legal heirs: 2(Kha) 2(Uma) and others
An application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Decree)
480
Abony Roy =Versus= Rajeswar Mojumder and others
An application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Decree)
481
Forak Ahamed {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(a)-1(q)}. =Versus= Ahmed Rahim alias Emdad Meah (Minor) and others
An application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
482
Md. Muzaher Mia and another =Versus= Ahmed Safa and others
The applications under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Order)
483
Manager, Mercantile Bank Limited, Patuakhali Branch, Holding No. 151-152, Ward No. 06 (Old-02), Sadar Road, Natun Bazar, Patuakhali Sadar, Patuakhali. =Versus= Shahida Begum and others
An application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. (Against Decree)
484
Abdus Samad and others Vs. Mahfuzur Rahman Mamun
485
Md. Ruhul Amin ……... Plaintiff-appellant Versus Rima Khatun and another …..... Defendants-respondents
486
Managing Director, Concord Progotee Consortium Limited and another. … Claimants-Opposite parties-Appellants -VersusRajdhani Unnayan Kartipakkha (RAJUK) and another. …Respondents-Petitioners-Respondents
Allowed
487
Gol Vanu Bibi being dead her heirs; Md. Ali Nowab and others ... Plaintiffs-Appellants. -VersusFul Moti Begum and others … Defendants-Respondents.
Allowed
488
Sree Digen vs the state
489
Abdur Razzaque Munshi and another Vs. Abdul Kader Munshi being dead his legl heirs 1(a) Sufia Begum and others
Discharged
490
Barrister Nasir Uddin Ahmed Ashim Vs. Premier Leasing
Allowed.
491
Ataur Rahman Vs. Mrs. Rezia Begum and others.
Disposed of
492
Md. Hafizur Rahman -Versus- The State and another
493
Nazneen Husain .... Petitioner -VersusRuhi Murshid Ahmed and others ....Opposite-parties
Absolute
494
Litmond Shipping Ltd, Sharif Mansion, (3rd Floor) 56- 57, Motijheel C/A Dhaka and 105, Hossain Chamber, Agrabad Commercial Area, Chittagong represented by its Sr. Executive (Shipping) Md. Abdul Malek.-Vs-Tiryaki Agro FZE of the United Arab Emirates, P.O. Box 10559, United Arab Emirates represented by their Attorney Mohammad Waliullah, son of late Abdul Malek, Village- Astragram, P.O. Miar Bazar, Police Station- Nangolkot, District- Comilla and another.
Absolute
495
Md. Harun-or-Rashid and others Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others
496
The State Vs Md. Alamgir Dhali and others
497
Md. Hasanuzzaman @ Polash VS The state and another
498
Md. Amej Uddin VS The State
499
Hamela Khatun Vs The State
500
Asad @ Md. Asasd and another Vs The State
501
Abdul Hamid Vs Nurul Absar and another
502
Ansarul Haque VS The State
503
Ruhul Amin Sikder -Vs- Mohammad Aiyub Khan and others.
If there any reasonable apprehensions born in the mind of a person for certain circumstances applying for transfer the suit that he would not receive fair dealings at his trial, or, in other words, that he may not have a fair and impartial trial and may not get justice in the Court, where the suit is pending, the suit should be transferred.
504
Md. Sahidul Islam Hira Vs. Md. Saidur Rahman and another
disposed of
505
Rabia Begum and another Vs. RAJUk and others.
Discharged as being infructuous
506
Mohammad Abu Taher Vs. Md. Ekramul Haque being dead his legal heirs; (1)(a) Kawsar Begum and others.
Absolute.
507
Managing Director, Concord Progotee Consortium Limited and another. … Claimants-Opposite parties-Appellants -VersusRajdhani Unnayan Kartipakkha (RAJUK) and another.…Respondents-Petitioners-Respondents
The appeal is allowed.
508
Nasir Uddin @ Md. Nasir Uddin -Vs-Amin Ullah and others
The order of dismissal of the suit was not under any of the rules of Order 9 of the Code. All the rules of Order 9 CPC refer to the date fixed for hearing the suit and as such the court, in my opinion, should not have rejected the application on the ground of limitation as application under Order 9 rule 4 CPC is not attracted to the facts of the present case. In the light of the decision in Brojendra Lal Roy I am of the opinion that the learned Munsif ought to have treated the application as being one made under section 151 CPC to which no period of limitation applies. This is certainly an important question of law. In that view of the matter, the contention of the learned Advocate that the suit should have been restored and heard seems to be of substance.
509
Md. Halim vs the state
510
Intraco CNG Limited and others -Versus- Agrani Bank Limited and others
Dismissed for non-prosecution
This Site is Visited :