Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
421
Tanjina vs the state
422
Nasir Uddin vs the state
423
Dist. Dhaka Md. Nuruzzaman and another vs the state
424
Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Narail -Vs- Muklesur Rahman Molla and Samirunnesa being died their legal heirs: Shahidul Islam Molla and others
425
Musa and others … Appellants -VersusAbdul Bari and others …Respondents
Allowed
426
Md. Mostofa Kamal -Versus- Koitoba Corporation and another
427
Md. Manju -Versus- The State and another
428
Md. Alomgir Hossain and others-VersusMd. Shariful Islam and others
Absolute
429
Md. Alomgir Hossain and others -VersusMd. Shariful Islam and others
Discharged for non-prosecution
430
Abdul Mannan and others -VersusBangladesh Railway and others
Absolute
431
Md. Serajul Islam being dead his heirs and legal representatives: Memtaz Begum and others -Versus- Jalil Ahmed and others
Discharged for non-prosecution
432
Md. Nazmul Hossain and others … Appellants-petitioners -VersusBangladesh House Building Finance Corporation and another …Respondents-opposite parties
Dismissed
433
Md. Rabiul Karim Vs. The State and another
434
Abdu8s Sattar Mia VS. Zaher Ali Khan and others
435
Md. Yousuf Ali, Proprietor, M/s Nuru and Sons Co. vs. M.V. Hearty Falcon, sold in auction and others
436
Md. Anwarul Huq vs. Md. Nuruzzaman Master being dead his legal heirs Jahanara Begum and others
DISCHARGED
437
Abdul Karim vs Md. Mominul Hoque Badshah being dead his legal heirs Ferdous Begum and others
Disposed of
438
Abdul Barek and others. … Plaintiffs-Appellants -Versus Md. Abdul Kadir and others. …Defendants-Respondents
The appeal is allowed
439
Amena Begum and Md. Rustom Ali being dead his heirs: 1(a) Most Pori Vanu and others
440
Bibijan Vs. Khaleda Akhter Khatun and others
441
Mahmuda Noor (Khuki) … Appellant -VersusShahnaj Begum being dead now her heirs 1(a) Marium Akhtar Merry and others …Respondents
Dismissed
442
Md. Hanif Ali Vs. The State and another
443
Md. Azahar Ali Vs. Md. Akramul Kabir Khan
444
Md Sariful Islam vs the state
445
Mst. Anjuman Ara Begum Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others
Absolute
446
BSA Shipping Ltd. VS Customs Excise and Vat Appellate Tribunal and Others
447
Md. Asadul Haque and others … Appellants-defendants-petitioners -Versus- Md. Anisuzzaman and others … Respondents-plaintiffs-opposite parties
448
PHP ship Breaking
449
Marina Park
Absolute
450
Mahbub Shikdar vs the state
451
Brac Bank Ltd. Vs Customs Excise and Vat Appellate Tribunal, Benz-2 and Others
452
Rahima Begum being dead her heirs are already on record (defendant nos. 1(b) to 1(g) now appellants) 1. Khakon Kha and others.-Vs-Md. Ashraf Hossain and others.
Allowed
453
Md. Rafique Ahmed vs the State
454
Md. Shaha Ali @ Shaha Ali Pramanik Vs. The State
455
Shahidul Haque Bhuiyan Vs. The State and another
456
Md. Abdul Mannan and others -Vs- A.H.M. Saifullah and others
“If the question is whether the deed is genuine or not, the simple answer is, it being a registered document, is showered with a strong presumption as to genuineness. Sections 59, 79, and 144 of the Evidence Act also lend support to section 60 of the Registration Act on this score. No doubt, this presumption is rebuttable, It is the settled proposition of law that in a suit for cancellation of a deed/ setting aside a decree passed by a competent court, it is incumbent upon the plaintiff to prove by cogent evidence that the decree/deed was obtained by fraud practicing. it is well settled that in the determination of the question of facts, parties should not be allowed to lead evidence without proper pleadings.
457
CEAT Bangladesh Limited .... Petitioner -VersusMagnum Engineering
Absolute
458
M.T. Gagasan Johor and another vs. M.V. Banglar Shikha and others
DISMISSED
459
Md Abul Kalam Azad Vs. The State and another
460
Aleya Begum and others Vs. Md. Mohsin and others
461
Md Abul Kalam Azad Vs. The State and another
462
Md. Saiful Alam Bhuiyan Vs. Md. Shahnor Bhuiyan being dead his legal heirs- Rashida Begum and others
463
The government of Bangladesh and others … Appellants -VersusSayed Rahmatur Bor Ertija Ahsan and others …Respondents
Allowed
464
Dipayan Mondal -Versus- The State and another
465
Md. Azmat Ali Vs. Most. Hosna Banu and others
466
Md. Abdul Ali Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Land, Netrokona and others
467
Md. Saiful islam vs the state
468
Md. Azimel Kadar vs- The state and another
servcie Matter- transfering from one scholl to another one
469
Mahmuda Begum and others Vs. Maifuza Akter and others
470
Md. Abdul Motaleb Hawlader -Vs- Md. Shahadath Hossain being dead, his legal heirs: Khairun Nessa and others.
Muslim law requires no particular formalities for the creation of a Wasiyatnama. It may be made in writing, or oral, or even by gestures. In the case of a written Wasiyatnama, there should be two witnesses to the declaration of Wasiyatnama. However, the intention of the Testator must be unequivocal and unambiguous that the Wasiyatnama is to be executed after his death. Any expression that signifies the Testator`s intention is sufficient to constitute a bequest. In the case of an oral Wasiyatnama, no specific number or class of witnesses is necessary for its validity. However, the following conditions need to be satisfied:- I. Legator`s intention to make a Wasiyatnama must be proved beyond doubt. III. Terms of the Wasiyatnama must be proved III. Wasiyatnama must be proved with the greatest possible exactness. When the Testator fails to mention the quantity or amount of bequeathed property, regard may be given to the number or quantity owned by the Testator at the time of death. Wasiyatnama shall be executed after paying debts and funeral expenses. To confirm a Wasiyatnama executed, there is no essence required by law for filing a probate case by a Muslim.
This Site is Visited :