Judgment : High Court Division
(If you feel problem with font, please, download Bangla font from Downloads Link)
Case Category : 
Case Type
Case Number
Short Description

Case Number Parties Short Description
21 Asian Traffic Technologies Ltd. Vs The Government of Bangladesh represented by theSecretary, Road, Transport and Highways Division,Ministry of Road, Transport and Bridges, BangladeshSecretariat, Dhaka-1000 and others
22 Shantinagar Bohumukhi Samabay samity VS Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka.
23 Rezia Bibi alias Most. Rezia Khatun Bibi VS Artha Rin Adalat, Bogra
24 The State-Vs-Oyshee Rahman 1. Condemned prisoner committed double murder without any apparent motive and was suffering from mental derailment or some sort of mental disorder and also suffering from ovarian cyst and bronchial asthma; 2. Her paternal grandmother and maternal uncle had a history of psychiatric disorders according to exibit-15; 3. She was around 19[nineteen] year old at the relevant time and the occurrence took place just immediately after her attaining the age of majority; 4. She has no such significant history of prior criminal activity [criminal cases] and 5. She had willingly surrendered to the police station soon after two days of the occurrence.
25 শেখ আবু সেলিম বনাম বাংলাদেশ হাউজ বিল্ডিং ফাইন্যান্স কর্পোরেশন গং
26 Md. Ataul Goni Sheikh and others Vs.The People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others
27 Abdul Kader Gazi Vs. The State and another The learned Judge of the Shishu Adalat, Chandpur committed serious error of law and exceeded its jurisdiction while dealing with the application for bail of an adult accused and that too without having the case record for trial in due course.
Moreover, section 18 of the Shishu Ain, 2013 will come into play after the case record is transmitted to the Shishu Adalat for trial, not before that.
28 Lokman Vs Ayub Ali and the State Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 118(a) and 138: Cheque is a negotiable instrument (section 13). In the instant case, the prosecution story as narrated in the petition of complaint and the deposition of the complainant as PW1 sharply contradicts each other as to when the complainant paid the money to the accused against which the cheque was issued to repay the same. The petition of complaint is silent about the date of monetary transaction, but states that the cheque was issued by the accused subsequently. In deposition, the complainant stated that the payment of money and issuance of the cheque took place on the same date which creates a doubt as to passing off consideration to the complainant against which the cheque was issued. Therefore, the presumption under section 118(a) of the Act, 1881 as to consideration has been successfully rebutted by the defence. ...(Para 14) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 9: In my view, the trial Court has correctly found that the complainant is not the holder of the cheque in due course. ...(Para 17)
29 The State-Vs- Qamrul Islam and others
30 Kamruzzaman Khan Vs.Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law,Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat,Ramna, Dhaka and others
31 The State Vs. Md. Foysal Bin Nayem @ Dip and Redoyanul Azad @ Rana
32 Rama Prasanna Bhattacharjee vs. Government of Bangladesh and others DO letter is not an official communication made by any machinery of the Republic.
33 Dr. Zubaida Rahman vs. The State and another
34 Moudud Ahmed vs. The State and another
35 Raghib Rauf Chowdhury vs. Government of Bangladesh and others Regarding the appointment of Judges of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh
36 Association of Ship Recycling in Bangladesh and another Vs. The Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others
37 Md. Milad Hossain @ Milad Uddin Vs. The State Therefore, the Registrar General of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh is directed to constitute a Monitoring Cell headed by him or the Registrar of the High Court Division along with the Secretary or his representative not below the rank of Additional Secretary of the Ministry of Home Affairs and Law and Justice Division, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs. The Monitoring Cell shall monitor this aspect and shall submit report from time to time to the concerned authorities of the responsible persons for taking appropriate action in accordance with section 31Ka (3) of the Act, 2000 with a copy thereof to the Monitoring Committee for the Subordinate Judiciary of the Supreme Court.
38 The State -Vs- Abul Kashem Kha
39 The State -Vs- Zakir Hossain and another
40 The State-Vs- Md. Ramjan Sheikh and another
This Site is Visited :