Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
121
Md. Zakir Hossain Vs. The State
122
Shahajada Khan and others all sons and daughters of late Md. Saidur Rahman Khan and mother Mrs. Hosnara Sayed all of House No. 07, Road No. 23, Sector- 07, Uttara, Dhaka-1230.-Vs-Mohammad Zakaria Khan, son of late Fazlur Rahman Khan and mother late Safiya Begum House No. 09, Road No. 47, Gulshan-2, Dhaka and Director of the defendant nos. 10-17 Company and others.
Appeal Allowed and Rule Absolute
123
Muhammad Ismail and another .... Petitioners -VersusHabibuddin Minto and others ....Opposite-parties
Discharged
124
Divisional Forest Officer and others … Appellants -VersusMuhammad Ali and another …Respondents
Dismissed
125
Md. Habibur Rahman Mia and another … Appellants-petitioners -VersusGovernment of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Faridpur …Respondents-opposite parties
Dismissed
126
Md. Mustakim Billah and another Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka-1000 and others.
Absolute
127
Md. Kamaruddahar Tokon and others -vs- Subrato Kumar Ghosh and others.
Rule discharged
128
The State -Versus- Mehedi Hasan Rasel and others
129
Md. Eklas Chowdury and others Versus Bangladesh and others
130
Md. Shahidul Hossain Ahmed and others vs Bangladesh and others
131
Uttara Club Limited -Vs- Md. Yousuf Kapadia and others.
Discharged.
132
Md. Sohel Rana Vs. Most. Ripa Akter (Alo) and another.
Allowed.
133
Hazera Begum and others vs. Md. Shafiqul Islam and others
Amendment of plaint
134
Md. Abu Sufian Vs. Nasira Sultana Shammi
Discharged.
135
Sohel Vs. The State
136
Md. Kamal Mia Vs. Md. Abul Kashem and others.
Discharged.
137
Md. Saher Ali and others. Vs. Keramot Kazi and others.
Disposed of.
138
Md. Shafiqul Islam Vs Md. Rafiqul Islam and others.
Disposed of.
139
Dulal Krishno Dewari and others Vs. Abdul Sattar being dead his heirs- Abdul Ahad and others
140
Md. Liton Mia vs- The state
Absolute
141
Ferdousi Amin Mithun and others ...Petitioners -Versus- Abdul Sabur and others …Opposite Parties
142
Md. Bazlur Rahman and others ...Plaintiff-petitioners -Versus- Md. Abu Bakkar Siddique alias Lalu and another …Defendant-opposite parties
143
Md. Meinul Hossen and others vs. M.T. FADL-E-RABBI and others
DECREED-IN-PART
144
Al-Safa Tower Ltd. ....Petitioner -Versus- B.N.S. Read Estate Ltd. and others ….Opposite parties
145
Tapan Chandra Shill Vs. Gopal Chandra Shill and others
146
Abu Hanif Vs. The State
148
Md. Jamal Hossain Bhuiyan vs. The Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Internal Resources Division, Government of the People`s Republic Bangladesh, Segunbagicha, Police Station-Ramna, Dhaka, and others
Absolute
149
Md. Fakhrul Alam vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others
Discharged
150
Md. Abuzar Gaffari -Versus- The State and another
151
Akabbar @Ali Akbar and another Vs. The State
152
Md. Haider Ali and others -Versus- Md. Ahmad Ali Dewan and others
Absolute
153
Prince Builders Limited and another Opposite party nos. 9 and 10-Appellants -VersusNajmun Nahar and others Applicants-Respondents
The appeal is allowed.
154
The State Vs. Md. Kamrul Islam Dhali
155
The State Vs. Azim Uddin
156
Ms. Momtaj Begum (Ruma) vs. the State and another
Absolute
157
Md. Ansar Ali, being dead, his legal heirs: Md. Barek Ali and others. Vs Md. Md. Abu Bakar Siddique and others.
When a suit is barred by law, the court can dismiss the suit under Order 7 Rule 11 and also take recourse to section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
158
Md. MOtiyar Rahman @ Moti being dead his heirs- Mst. Fenci Begum and others Vs. Md. Abdul Gani and others
159
Rupali Bank Limited, Narsingdi Branch, Dhaka Vs. Md. amjad Hossain Bhuiyan
Discharged
160
Md. Jane Alam vs The state
Absolute
161
Khaleda Parvin Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Dhaka
Absolute
162
Md. Ismail Hossain and another -Versus- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Secondary and Higher Education Division, Ministry of Education, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others,
163
Ahmmed Nabi Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh Bank Others.
164
Md. Nizam Uddin vs the state and another
165
Md. Rahat Ali being dead his legal heirs: 1(Ka) Karamat Ali and others vs. Md. Vadu Pramanik being dead his legal heirs: 1(Ka) Abu Musa and others
Discharged
166
Nargis Akter and others vs.Sayed Mahbub-E-Jamil
Discharged
167
Md. Omar Faruque Khan-Vs-Zonal Manager, Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Zonal Office, Zone-1, 1046 Khan A Sabur Road, Power House Moor, Sadar, Khulna and others
Discharged
168
Md. Iftekar Ahmod Sakil, being Minor represented by his father, Md. Hussain Ahmod Lokus and another … Defendants-Appellants. -VersusMd. Abdul Basit and others …Plaintiffs-Respondents.
The appeal is dismissed
169
The above considerations in the light of the relevant case-law lead to the following enunciations: (1) that the necessity of making a second demand, called the talab-i-istishhad, is dispensed with if the first demand, called the talab-i-mawasibat, was made in the presence of the vendor or the vendee or on the premises sold and in the presence of witnesses who heard that demand, even though there was no invocation of those witnesses at the time, and (2) that the necessity of making a reference to the first demand at the time of making the second demand is dispensed with if the first demand was made in the presence of the vendor or the vendee or on the premises sold. If the first demand is made in the presence of witnesses of the vendor or vendee, or on the premises sold and in the presence of witnesses who heard the demand, it was not necessary to mention the fact of the first demand at the time of the Talab-i-isshad. We can sum up in this way that the case laws declared by any superior court other than Bangladesh including Pakistan after 25th March, 1971 (that is after independence of Bangladesh) and that of India after 13th August, 1947 (that is after partition of Pakistan) are not applicable in our jurisdiction as binding precedents.
170
Md. Jalal Ahmmed -Versus- The State and another
This Site is Visited :