: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Globe Construction Limited -vs- Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakkha (RAJUK) and others
Appeal Dismissed. Rule Discharged
2
Md. Yasin Ali Sheikh VS Md. Mohammad Ishaq and others
Absolute
3
Babu Prodeep Kanti Das ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ... Opposite parties
The Rule is disposed of
4
Reaz Uddin Shepai ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka ...Respondent
The appeal is allowed
5
Md. Iqbal Hossein ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Respondents
The Appeal is disposed of
6
Md. Abdul Hannan Master ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Respondents
The Appeal is disposed of
7
Abdul Jalil Mridha -Versus- Most. Fatima Johora and others
Absolute
8
Executive Engineer, Bangladesh Water Development Board, Natore Vs. Khan Mohammad Monjur-E-Khuda being died his legal heirs: 1(a) Parvez Mahmud Khan and others
The opposite parties as plaintiff filed Other Class Suit Number 33 of 2006 in the Court of the Senior Assistant Judge, Natore on 12.02.2006 seeking a declaration of title in respect of 0.1544 acres of land appertaining to C.S. and S.A. Plot Numbers 1756 and 1757 corresponding to R.S. Plot Number 2604.
9
Md. Naimur Rahman Tony and others Vs.Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Medical Education and Family Welfare Division, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and another
Disposed of
10
Sharif Uddin Md. Hassan and others Vs. RJSC and others.
Allowed.
11
Hosne Ara ... Defendant No.2-Petitioner Versus Government Haji Mohammad Mohsin College and others ...Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged without any order as to costs.
12
The State Vs. Most. Lucky Khatun and another
The Death Reference is rejected with modification of sentence; consequently the Criminal Appeal No.8455 of 2018 and Jail Appeal No.247of 2018 are dismissed with modification of sentence.
13
The State … Appellant -Versus- Md. Sohel Biswash ….Condemned-Prisoner
the Death Reference No. 75 of 2018 is rejected and both the Criminal Appeal No.7561 of 2018 and Jail Appeal No.212 of 2018 are hereby dismissed.
14
Md. Mizanur Rahman …Appellant-Petitioner Versus Mosammot Rasheda Khatun and another ...Defendant-Opposite parties
Absolute-in-part
15
Mst. Nestara Begum Vs Md. Tohirul Islam and others
Discharged
16
Md. Babul Islam -Versus- Md. Alimuddin and others
Absolute, sending the case on remand to the trial Court.
17
Maulana Nurul Islam -Versus- Mawlana A.B.M Nuruzzaman and another
Discharged
18
Pochondor Ali and others versus Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sunamganj and others
Absolute in part
19
Rujina Akhter vs Government of Bangladesh and others
Judgment of Habeus Corpus
20
Masudur Rahman and others -Versus- Md. Anowar Hossain and others
Discharged with costs
21
S.M. Md. Abdul Baten and others vs.Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Senior Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration and another
Absolute
22
Md. Abul Karim Molla Vs Md. Sadek Ali Molla and others
Absolute
23
Subash Chandra Dey -Versus- Shaymal Chandra Sheel and others
Absolute
24
Laxmi Bilders Limited -Versus- Masons Enterprise Limited and others
This First Appeal is allowed.
25
ICE(BD) Limited Vs. Chandra Spinning Mills Limited and another
Application for addition of party is rejected with cost of Tk. 10,000/-
26
Most. Aliya Vs Md. Saidur Rahman
Discharged
27
Md. Belayet Hossain and others-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Water Resources and others
Discharged
28
Md. Kamruzzaman-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Recourses and others
Discharged
29
Laila Shahed-Vs-Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others
Discharged
30
Sobuj Sheikh ...Convict- Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ............... Opposite Parties.
The Rule is discharged
31
Md. Mojibur Rahman -vs- The State and another
Absolute
32
Shahid Ul Hasan Vs the State and another
Discharged
33
LUFESA DIVER`S SCRL -VS-M.V. PRINCESS JIA JIA AND OTHERS
Application is allowed.
34
Mohammad Salauddin Khan Vs the State and another
Disposed of
35
Most. Akhi Begum Vs the State and another
Absolute
36
Abdullah Ahmed Vs. The Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others.
Dismissed with cost of Tk. 50,000/-
37
Pochondor Ali and others vs Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sunamganj and others
Absolute in part
38
Moslem Gazi and others -Versus- Md. Ismail and others
Disposed of
39
Towhid Samad and others Vs. The Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others.
Dismissed
40
Mohd. Akhtaruzzaman vs Government of Bangladesh and others.
...
41
Nasiruddin Mollah and others … Pre-emptee-Petitioners -Versus- Motaleb Mollah and others ...Pre-emptor -Opposite Parties
Discharged
42
Abul Kashem and another ... Defendant-Appellants -Versus- Sufia Begum being died her heirs 1(1) Abul Hossain and others ... Plaintiff-Respondents
Allowed
43
Md. Shafiqul Islam ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents
The appeal is allowed
44
Abdul Kuddus Khan ... Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
45
Md. Abdul Jalil, being dead, his legal heirs:- 1(a) Most Nazma Begum and others -Versus- Md. Azam Ali Miah, being dead, his legal heirs:- 1(a) Malek Miah and others
Absolute with costs
46
Shukur Ali Master and others -Versus- Doraj Kazi and others
.
47
Mohammad Ali and others Vs. Abdul Jabber alias Vatesh and others
It is well settled that an order of remand is not to be made as a matter of course. Remand should not be ordered merely to enable a party to fill up a lacuna caused by his own negligence or laches. At the same time, where the Court is satisfied that a party was prevented from effectively contesting the suit for reasons not attributable to deliberate or culpable conduct on his part, and that denial of an opportunity to contest would cause substantial prejudice, the Court may, in the interest of justice, exercise its discretion to remand the matter.

A compromise between some of the parties cannot, in law, operate to extinguish or adversely affect the independent rights claimed by non-consenting parties without adjudication of their claims.
48
Shahe Alam Kazi and others Vs Shahe Alam and others
Absolute
49
Md. Shibul Hossain vs. The state
Absolute
50
Rafiqul Islam and another -Versus- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Primary and Mass Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka-1000; and others
Disposed of
This Site is Visited :