Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Khan Mohammad Shahabuddin -Versus- The Mayor Dhaka City Corporation and others ……Respondents
Dhaka North City Corporation.
2
Maruf Travels represented by its proprietor Abdul Matin-Versus- Bangladesh and others.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a total of 508 persons sent by the petitioner in 2024 to Saudi Arabia to perform Umrah Hajj did not return to Bangladesh.
3
Madina Air Travels Limited represented by its Proprietor Fazlur Rahman.-Versus- Bangladesh and others.
63 persons sent by the petitioner in 2024 to Saudi Arabia to perform Umrah Hajj did not return to Bangladesh.
4
Md. Shaheen Uddin Miah -Versus- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Dhaka and others.
post of Kanungoo.
5
British American Tobacco Company Bangladesh Ltd.-Versus- National Board of Revenue, represented by its chairman and others
6
British American Tobacco Company Bangladesh Ltd.-Versus-National Board of Revenue, represented by its chairman and others
7
Bangladesh Export Processing Zone Authority -Versus- Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Dhaka and others
8
Ujjol Ahmed -Versus- Bangladesh represented by its Secretary, local Government Division, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and cooperatives, Bangladesh Secretarial, Dhaka and others.
9
Md. Samsuddin Ahamed vs Dhaka North City Corporation and others
Dhaka City Corporation matter
10
Md. Anwar Hossain Sikder and others vs Secretary, Ministry of Liberation War Affairs, Dhaka and others
Challenging the action of the respondents in withholding payment of the honorary allowance granted to them as Freedom Fighters.
11
Md. Mojammal Hoque vs Bangladesh Election Commission, represented by the Secretary, Election Commission Secretariat, Dhaka and others
Union Parishad election matter
12
Rakib-Ud Doula Chowdhury vs Administrator of Waqfs, Bangladesh and others
Waqf matter
13
Gouranga Chandra Saha and others vs Senior District Judge Court, Faridpur and Vested Property Repatriate Appeal Tribunal, District Faridpur and others
14
Md. Farid Uddin Akhtar_vs_The Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives Bangladesh and others
15
Mrs. Salina Akndo and others_vs_Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Controller of Accounts, Dhaka and others
16
Omer Ali Vs Government of Bangladesh and others
Overseas visit by government officials; Held: Prior permission to be obtained not only from parent Ministry, but also from Ministry of Public Administration and Ministry of Finance.
17
Md. Mahboob Murshed Vs Bangladesh and others
Rule 300 (a) of Bangladesh Service Rules, Forfeiture of Pension. Held: Unconstitutional
18
M. Asafuddowlah Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka.
The current trend of making/posting the Civil Servents as Officers on Special Duty (OSD) without assigning any special duty, whatsoever, beyond the scope of Circular No. Sa.Ma/ (Bi:Pro:)-12-90-03(200) dated 03.10.1991 and keeping them as OSD for unlimited period longer than the periods prescribed in the said Circular dated 03.10.1991.
19
Lt. Sheikh Jamal Dhanmondi Club Ltd. Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Youth and Sports, Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh and others
20
Samia Rahman and others Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and others
21
Oli Ahmed Chowdhury being dead his legal heirs: 1(a). Jarina Begum and others Vs. Md. Osman Gani and others
Starting point of Limitation for filing a pre-emption case is the date, when the impugned sale deed has been registered under section 60 of the Registration Act, 1908
22
Sarwar Alam Chowdhury being dead his legal heirs: 1(ka) Fazilatun Nessa Mimi and others vs Govt. of Bangladesh and others
Abandoned property: - For release of abandoned property, claimant have to prove that the owner or his legal heirs occupying supervising and managing the disputed property on 28.02.1972, while President`s Order No. 16 of 1972 came into force.
23
United International University vs The Commissioner of Taxes with Manarat Dhaka International College vs The Commissioner of Taxes
(Full Bench Decision): Private universities/colleges imparting education are not required to produce any exemption certificate or letter issued by NBR to get tax exemption in view of the provisions under SRO No. 454-L/80(a) dated 31.12.80 as amended by SRO No. 178-Income Tax/2002 dated 03.07.2002 issued by the NBR.
24
The Commissioner of Taxes vs Haji Mohammad Ali Meah Waqf Estate
(Full Bench Decision): The part of income of a private religious trust (Waqf), which is not applied or set a part for benefit of public but is applied or set a part for the benefit of Waqif and his descendants, is not entitled to get exemption of tax under Section 44 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984 read with Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Part A of the Sixth Schedule thereto.
25
The Commissioner of Taxes vs Transfin Trading Ltd and others
(Full Bench Decision): In view of the proviso to Clause-(iii) of sub-section(1) of Section 29 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984, the Assessee is not entitled to allowance of deduction of interests paid on the capital borrowed by it for the purpose of its business or profession only in case of transfer of that capital or any part thereof to another entity whose income is exempted from payment of tax.
26
Md. Mujihid Zamil vs Commissioner of Customs
Writ Petition 9656/2011, WP 9567 of 2011, 9568 of 2011, 9569 of 2011, 9608 of 2011, 9653 of 2011, 9654 of 2011, 9655 of 2011, 9657 of 2011, 9659 of 2011, 9660 of 2011, 9661 of 2011, 9662 of 2011, 2993 of 2011, 9664 of 2011 and 9665 of 2011.(Against final assessment under Customs Act, 1969 appeal has to be filed under section 193 of the said Act and writ petition not maintainable)
27
Muktar Gazi Vs Govt. of Bangladesh
Suspension of Chairman of Union Parishad on ground of conviction in criminal cases. Held: Due to pendency of appeal, conviction yet to reach its finality and as such the order of suspension has been declared as without lawful authority and be of no legal effect.
28
Roushanara Akter Vs Dhaka City Corporation
Gulshan Park, can not lease out to any third party for any other purpose.
29
Kamal Uddin Ahmed Vs The Chairman, National Board of Revenue
IACT can invoke section 120 of the Income Tax Ordinance, where the order passed by DCT is erroneous
30
Sreemat Sudarshanananda Puri Gurupita Vs Sree Joy Prakash Mitra Chowdhury and others
Amendment of Pleading regarding admission can not be omitted by way of amendment.
31
Haji Tahir Ali Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh and others
Procedure for establishment of primary school on scheme.
32
Criminal Appeal(H) 281/2002