Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Md. Ismail Hossain. Vs. Most. Feroza Begum being dead her legal heirs and others.
Discharged.
2
Mohammad Ali Molla. Vs. Md. Delwar Hossain Molla and others.
Absolute in part.
3
Summit Industrial and Mercantile Corporation (Pvt.) Ltd., and another. Vs. Bangladesh Power Development Board and another.
Rejected.
4
The Joint Venture of China Major Bridge Engineering Company Limited and Project Builders Limited, (MBEC-PBL, JV). Vs. Chief Engineer, Road and Highways Department and others.
Dismissed.
5
Md. Monzur Rahman Vs. The Secretary, LGED, Dhaka
Dismissed
6
Khulna Industrial Com. Limited. Vs. Z.M. International.
Disposed of.
7
Sayed Salah Uddin (Advocate) Vs. A.K.M. Ala Uddin Chowdhury and others.
Discharged
8
Titu Sikder Vs. Md. Babul Kazi and others.
Discharged.
9
Dino Bondhu Sarkar being dead his legal heirs; 1(a) Suvankar Sarkar and others-Vs-Chittaranjan Biswas and others
Discharged
10
Major Mohmad Abu Taher Rtd. Bir Muktijodda vs the state and another
11
Siddiqur Rahman vs the state and another
12
Nurul Islam and another vs the state
13
Adex Corporation Limited represented by its Managing Director, Mr. Ali Azam of address: 374 (4th and 5th Floor), Tejgaon Industrial Area, Dhaka-1208.-Vs-Rangpur City Corporation represented by the Mayor Office Building, Rangpur-5400 and others.
Discharged
14
Zarrin Suba …Applicant-Appellant. -VersusNational Credit and Commerce Bank Limited and others …Opposite parties-Respondents.
The appeal is dismissed
15
Friends Multi Trade Company vs. M.V. Hearty Falcon and others
DISMISSED
16
Md. Jahangir Habibi Vs.Most. Suraiya and another
17
Ariful Islam, son of late Md. Badiul Alam, Address: C/586/A, Khilgaon Punarbashan Zone, Khilgaon, Dhaka and others.-Vs-Nagar Homes Limited represented by its Senior Executive, Md. Omar Faruk Majumder, son of Alkas Mia Majumder, House No. 4/B, Road No. 62, Gulshan-2, Dhaka-1212.
Absolute
18
Jashimuddin Mazumdar, son of late Hazi Abdul Kader Mazumdar and others.-Vs-Zonal Settlement Officer, Noakhali Zone, Noakhali and others.
Absolute
19
Mst. Sufia Bewa and others vs Md. Bazlar Rahman and others.
Discharged
20
Government of Bangladesh and others vsMd. Abul Hossain Sowdagor and another
Dismissed
21
22
23
Mohammad Ali and others-Vs-H.M. Zakir Hossain being dead his legal heirs; 1(Ka) Anwara Begum and others
Disposed of
24
Md. Shahabuddin beind dead his hiers- Md. Suzauddin Sarker @ Md. Sirajul Islam Sujan and others Vs Government of Bangladesh
25
Sultana Razia and others. vs. Mohammad Ali and others.
Discharged
26
Khadija Rahman Versus Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Dhaka and another
Rule issued in Writ Petition No. 3305 of 2023 is discharged and Rule issued in Writ Petition No. 8383 of 2021 is disposed of.
27
City Seed Crushing Industries Limited and others versus Provita Feed Limited and another
Allowed in part
28
29
Md. Afaz Uddin and others vs Mst. Jubeda Khatun and others
Disposed of.
30
Gautam Biswas and others
Absolute
31
Commissioner of Customs Bond Commissionerate, Dhaka Versus Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and another
Dismissed
32
Md. Iftekher Alam @ Md. Iftekhear Alam (Mintu) Talukder Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Disposed of
33
Baizid Steel Industries Limited Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 2, Dhaka and others
Absolute
34
Government of the People’s of Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Chuadanga-Vs-Khesbari Mondal being dead his legal heirs; 1(a) Mst. Rupvan Khatun and others
Disposed of
35
36
Most. Shahida Begum wife of late Ayub Ali and others -Vs-Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation, represented by its Regional Manager, Regional Office, Kushtia
Disposed of
37
Mohammad Kamruzzaman. Vs. Shahjalal University of Science
Absolute
38
The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram. Vs. Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and another.
Allowed
39
Abdul Malek and others Vs. Joynal Abedin and others
40
Md. Sultan Mahmud Fakir Vs. Alhaj Md. Mokjhleesar Rahman Mollah and others.
Discharged
41
Mosammat Peyara Khatun
Absolute
42
Most. Firoza Begum … Plaintiff-Appellant. -VersusLimo Electronics Limited and others. …defendants-Respondents.
The appeal is dismissed
43
Mokles and others. vs Hazi Md. Rafiqul Islam and others.
Rule is discharged
44
45
46
47
Woodland Plywood and Particle Board Mills Limited versus National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
48
Mrs. Zubaida Rahman Khan, wife of Mr. Tarique Rahman, of 6, Shahid Mainul Road, Dhaka Cantonment, Dhaka, at present House No.01, Road No.79, Gulshan-2, Dhaka -Versus- The State and another
49
H. M. Golam Reza, son of Alhaj Md. Sukur Ali at present- Road No. 159/8, Mirpur-10, District- Dhaka.-Vs-Erick Ershad, son of late Alhaj Hussain Mohammad Ershad permanent address- Polly Nibus, Post Dersona, Upazila- Rangpur Sadar, District- Rangpur, at present address: House No. 10, Dutabash Road, Baridhara Residential Area, Block- Ka, Police Station- Gulshan, District- Dhaka.
Dismissed and discharged
50
Md. Shafayet Alam vs Government of Bangladesh and others.
Third Wave Technologies Ltd., subsequently changed to Nagad Ltd. with permission of the Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms, Bangladesh (Annexure-A), entered into an agreement with BPO on 14.12.2017 (Annexure-B) as the “Principal Agent” of Bangladesh Post Office for carrying out the respective works, as stated therein on a revenue sharing basis. However, vide Section 11 of the Act, 2024 payment system participant /payment systems operator/payment service provider i.e. BPO shall be held liable /accountable jointly for the actions of its “agent”.
In view of the irregularities/illegalities being found by the inspection team of Bangladesh Bank in the operation of “Nagad” service Bangladesh Bank issued show cause notice to the Bangladesh Post Office who launched “Nagad” service, under Section 31(2) and on receipt of its reply took steps under Section 31(1) with appointment of Administrator for “Nagad” service for the interest of users and other stakeholders being involved with the operation of the said service.
As such, the proposition of the petitioner as to issuance of show cause notice upon Nagad Ltd., an agent of Bangladesh Post Office under Section 31(1) of the Act, 2024 independent of BPO has no substance at all.
In view of the above, challenging the appointment of the Administrator of “Nagad” service of Bangladesh Post Office under Section 31(1) by the Director of Nagad Ltd., the company who is the “agent” of Bangladesh Post Office, under Article 102 of the Constitution is not maintainable for having no locus standi.
This Site is Visited :