Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Samir Chandra Sajwal being dead his legal heirs 1. Sudhir Chandra Sawjal and others.-Vs-The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Barishal and others.
Absolute
2
Mohammad Nurul Alam Chowdhury alias Ukil and another -Vs- Sree Shibu Prashad Dutta and others
Sub-section 3 of Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act stipulates that an application for preemption must be accompanied by a deposit of the entire consideration money of the property transferred, as stated in the notice under Section 89, together with compensation at the rate of 10% thereof. The statutory deposit being a condition precedent to the application being entertained, its non-compliance renders the application liable to be dismissed. The appellate court below failed to consider that the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act,1950, is a special law wherein the statutory provision for deposition of consideration money with compensation for filing a case for preemption under the Act is provided as a condition precedent with consequence.
3
Md. Mostafa Sheikh and another. -Versus- Md. Awal Kabir and others.
Disposed of.
4
The Divisional Forest Officer, Dhaka Forest Division, Forest Bhaban Gulshan Road, Mahakhali, Dhaka-1212-Vs-Dainuddin Munshi being dead his legal heirs; 1(a) Md. Fazlur Rahman and others
Absolute
5
Alam Mian-Vs-Pariskarer Nessa being dead her legal heirs; 1(a) Mosammat Khadeza Begum and others
Discharged
6
Dhiman Chandra Paul-Vs-Ranajit Kumar Paul and others
Discharged
7
Sharmin Sultana Chowdhury and others-Vs-Mrs. Suraiya Akhter Khanam and others
Discharged
8
Rezia Begum and others-Vs-Bazal Ahmed Chowdhury being dead his legal heirs; 1(a) Mosammat Ruksana Begum Chowdhury and others
Disposed of
9
Md. Shahabuddin and another versus Khandakar Shahidur Rahman and others
Discharged
10
Mohammad Saiful Alam-Vs-Abdul Momen and others
Discharged
11
Kamrul Ashraf Khan versus Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation (BCIC) represented by its Chairman of BCIC Building (4th Floor), 30-31, Dilkusha C/A, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh, and others.
Discharged
12
Md. Siddiqur Rahman-Vs-Md. Shahab Ali and others
Absolute
13
14
Hafaza Khatoon vs. Most. Rahima Begum and others
Discharged
15
Hafeza Khatoon vs. Md. Abdur Rahim alias Abdur Rahman
Discharged
16
Abdul Sattar Md. Ansar Ali, being dead, his heirs: Faridunnesa and others -Vs- Shamsuzzaman Khondaker and another
That against the wrong record of rights, the person whose interest is affected is entitled to file suit within six years from the date of final publication or the date of knowledge of such wrong records of rights as per provision so enumerated in Article 120 of the limitation Act. Therefore, without making a further prayer for recovery of khas possession of the suit land, the suit is not maintainable.
17
Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh (HRPB) Vs. Govt of Bangladesh and others
White Stone
18
Suruj Miah Spinning Mills Ltd. represented by its Managing Director Md. Suruj Miah, having its place of business at Sena Kallyan Bhaban (16th Floor), Suite No. 1603, 1604, 195, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka-1000 and another.-Vs-Bangladesh Bank, Head Office, Bangladesh Bank Bhaban, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka represented by its Governor and others.
Discharged
19
Md. Sarwar vs. Nahida Begum Mily
DISCHARGED
20
S. M. Faridul Hoque being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Khodeja Khatun and others … Petitioners -VersusThe Secretary Ministry of land, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. … Respondents
Discharged
21
Md. Abul Hossain … Petitioner -VersusBangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. … Respondents
Absolute
22
Tahamina Khatun … Petitioner in Writ Petition No. 825 of 2010 -VersusGovernment of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh and others .. Respondents in Writ Petition No. 825 of 2010
Discharged
23
Syed Tanvir Hossain … Petitioner -VersusBangladesh Bank and others. … Respondents
Discharged
24
Kazi Abdul Mannan. -Versus- Chayan Begum and others.
Discharged.
25
Ahamed Akbar Sobhan -Vs- Unideb Trading (BD) Ltd, represented by its Director Tahmina Akter and others.
If the proposed amendment is allowed even condoning the delay in filing the application under Order VI rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure for amendment of the plaint, the introduction of certain new facts and subsequent cause of action different from those made in the plaint will change the nature and character of the suit. The amendment of the pleadings is that all the controversies between the parties as far as possible should be included and multiplicity of the proceedings avoided. We, therefore, do not find any reason to interfere with decisions of the Courts below.
26
Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh (HRPB) represented by the Secretary of the Executive Committee and another. … Petitioners -VersusThe Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others … Respondents
The Rule is disposed of
27
Unique Cement Industries Limited (UCIL) Vs Bangladesh Bank and others
28
Brithish American Tobacco Bangladesh Company Limited vs. The Commissioner, Large Taxpayer`s Unit and another.
29
Md. Mojibor Rahman. -Versus- Md. Jahir Uddin and others.
Discharged
30
Md. Nurul Huq Sheikh Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is discharged
31
Md. Hafez Uddin and others. -Versus- Md. Jafor Ali and others.
Absolute.
32
Dokkhin Khajurtala Sarkari Prathomik Bidyaloy. -Versus- Adhir Ranjan Chakravortyand others.
Absolute
33
Dokkhin Khajurtala Sarkari Prathomik Bidyaloy. -Versus- Adhir Ranjan Chakravortyand others.
34
Alomgir and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Liberation War and others
Rule is disposed of.
35
Md. Nazimuddin and others. -Versus- Sabiha Khatun and another.
Discharged.
36
S.M. Rezaul Karim Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Liberation War Affairs
Rule is disposed of
37
Md. Younus Miah and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is disposed of.
38
Zahirul Haque and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is discharged.
39
Md. Rukunuzzaman Talukder and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another
Rule is discharged.
40
Anisur Rahman and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and another
Rule is discharged.
41
42
Bashir Ahmed vs. Mokhlesur Rahman Chowdhury and others
Discharged
43
Rupali Bank Ltd. versus Md. Moslemuddin
Discharged
44
Jebun Nessa Khatun being dead her legal heirs: Md. Kamrul Huda and another versus Abul Kashem Al Asad and others
Allowed in part
45
Nibaro Chandra Mali being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Redoy Mali and others. -Versus- Gourango Chandra Mali and others.
Discharged.
46
Sajjad Ali Mondol being dead his legal heirs Md. Kayes Uddin and others.-Versus- Md. Moshaque @ Mosaraf and others.
Absolute.
47
Md. Shomesh Ali and others.-Versus- Advocate Simki Imam Khan and others.
Discharged.
48
Final FMA No.140 of 23, C Rule No.671(FM) of 2022, Corrected on 31.07.2025
49
50
Arifur Rahman vs state and another
This Site is Visited :