|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
1 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 5807/2023
(Criminal Appeal(H) 5807/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Jugal Chandra Pramanik ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Respondent |
The appeal is dismissed |
|
2 |
Writ Petition 5055/2024
(Writ Petition 5055/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Tajul Islam Taj -Versus- Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others |
|
|
3 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 5941/2023
(Criminal Appeal(H) 5941/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Anwar Hossain ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Respondent |
The appeal is dismissed |
|
4 |
First Appeal 375/2011
(First Appeal 375/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Tajul Islam Vs. Hasina Roushon Jahan and others |
|
|
5 |
First Appeal 374/2019
(First Appeal 374/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Deputy Commissioner, Brahmanbaria Vs. Habibur Rahman and others |
|
|
6 |
First Appeal 10/2018
(First Appeal 10/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Sattar Khan being dead his legal heirs- Shahnaz and others Vs. Arafat Mahmud |
|
|
7 |
Civil Revision 68/2026
(Civil Revision 68/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Abdul Quddus Vs. Purbachal Apparel Ltd. and others |
|
|
8 |
Writ Petition 5540/2025
(Writ Petition 5540/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Abdul Hai Talukder and others-Vs-Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others |
Discharged |
|
9 |
Writ Petition 13307/2022
(Writ Petition 13307/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Mominul Islam-Vs-The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, and others |
Absolute |
|
10 |
Writ Petition 11298/2013
(Writ Petition 11298/2013)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Abdur Rakib-Vs-Rural Electrification Board, represented by its Chairman and others |
Disposed of |
|
11 |
Writ Petition 11222/2025
(Writ Petition 11222/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Most. Poly and others-Vs-The Secretary, Ministry of Land, the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others |
Absolute |
|
12 |
Writ Petition 11898/2014
(Writ Petition 11898/2014)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Abdul Haque -Versus- The Chairman Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipokkha (RAJUK), RAJUK Bhaban, Motijheel, Dhaka, and others |
|
|
13 |
Writ Petition 13811/2024
(Writ Petition 13811/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Hasan Mahbub and others-Vs-Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance and others |
Discharged |
|
14 |
Writ Petition 5055/2024
(Writ Petition 5055/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-APR-26
|
Md. Tajul Islam Taj versus Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others |
Dissenting |
|
15 |
First Appeal 282/2004
(First Appeal 282/2004)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-APR-26
|
Trading Corporation of Bangladesh (TCB) and another versus M/S Italtrade International Ltd. A Company incorporated in the United Kingdom, represented by its local agent, Cosmos Marketing Consultant (Ltd.), A company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, with its Head Office, Cosmos Center, 69/1, New Circular Road, P.S. Ramna, District-Dhaka, and others |
Allowed in part |
|
16 |
First Appeal (TN) 1672/1993
(First Appeal (TN) 1672/1993)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-APR-26
|
Md. Nazrul Islam versus the Government of Bangladesh and another |
Absolute-in-part |
|
17 |
First Appeal 309/1998
(First Appeal 309/1998)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-APR-26
|
Shaikh Mosharraf Hossain being dead his heirs: Shaikh Refazul Hoque and others versus Shaikh Nurul Hoque and others |
Dismissed |
|
18 |
First Appeal 624/2019
(First Appeal 624/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-APR-26
|
Lutfur Rahman and others versus Md. Lutfur Rahman (Muktijoddya) and others |
Dismissed with cost |
|
19 |
First Appeal 171/2020
(First Appeal 171/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-APR-26
|
Md. Osman Goni and others versus Abdul Latif being dead his legal heirs: Mahmuda Parvin and others |
Dismissed with cost |
|
20 |
Criminal Misc 15021/2023
(Criminal Misc 15021/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-APR-26
|
Md. Moniar Hossain vs. The State |
Discharged |
|
21 |
Criminal Misc 6817/2023
(Criminal Misc 6817/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-APR-26
|
Md. Mohiuddin Moin Vs. The state |
Discharged |
|
22 |
Writ Petition 7216/2020
(Writ Petition 7216/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-APR-26
|
Md. Emrul Hassan vs Govt. and others |
|
|
23 |
Writ Petition 12793/2012
(Writ Petition 12793/2012)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-APR-26
|
Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh and another vs Govt. and others |
|
|
24 |
Civil Revision 698/2021
(Civil Revision 698/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-APR-26
|
Luxman Chandra Shil being dead his heirs Pankaj Chandra Shil and others. -Versus- Jamuna Rani Sarker and others |
Discharged. |
|
25 |
Civil Revision 1225/2021
(Civil Revision 1225/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-APR-26
|
Tapon Kumar Saha and others -Versus- Zudishtir Saha |
Discharged. |
|
26 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 522/2025
(Criminal Revision No. 522/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-APR-26
|
Md. Masud Rana ...Convict- Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ............... Opposite Parties. |
The Rule is discharged |
|
27 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 4612/2023
(Criminal Appeal No. 4612/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-APR-26
|
Poritosh Barai ... Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents |
The appeal is allowed |
|
28 |
Contempt Petition (TN) 374/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-26
|
Muhammad Mazharul Islam vs Dr. Mohammad Abdus Salam and others |
|
|
29 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 5053/2024
(Criminal Appeal(H) 5053/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-26
|
Md.Ershad Ali ..….. accused appellant Versus The State and another …… respondents Mr.Shishir Monir, Senior Advocate with Mr.Mohammad Abdul Wadud, Advocate and Mr. Md.Abdul Jalil, Advocate …… For the accused-appellant Mr. Junaed Hossen Khan, A.A.G …… For the respondent No.1 Mr.Khandoker Sultan Ahmed, Advocate with Mr.Md. Nazmus Sakib, Advocate …… For the respondent No.2 |
|
|
30 |
Civil Revision 3536/2024
(Civil Revision 3536/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-26
|
Mohammad Ali and others ...petitioners Md. Hafizul Mandal and others ... opposite parties Mr.Habib-Un-Nabi, Advocate ...for the petitioners Mr. M.G. Mahmud, Advocate ...for the opposite party Nos.1-3 |
|
|
31 |
Civil Revision 845/2006
(Civil Revision 845/2006)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-26
|
1(ka) Md. Nuruzzaman and others Defendant-Respondent-Petitioners Versus Md. Abdul Bari and others Plaintiff-Appellants- Opposite Parties Mr. Md. Nurul Amin, Senior Advocate for the petitioner Mr. A.K.M. Faiz, Senior Advocate with Ms. Kakoli Akter , Advocate for the opposite parties |
|
|
32 |
Civil Revision 3602/2025
(Civil Revision 3602/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-26
|
Abdul Wahab Plaintiff-appellant-petitioner Versus 1. Md. Ashraful Islam and others Defendant-respondents-opposite parties Mr.Akbar Hossain, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. M.G.Mahmud Shaheen, Advocate for the opposite party |
|
|
33 |
Civil Revision 2814/2023
(Civil Revision 2814/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-26
|
Md.Jasim Uddin Pre-emptor-appellant-petitioner Versus Kazi Amir Uddin being dead his heirs are:-1.Kalan Begum and others Pre-emptee-respondents-opposite parties No one appear for the petitioner Mr. Mohammad Jaynal Abedeen Bhuiyan, Advocate for the opposite party |
|
|
34 |
Civil Revision 639/2019
(Civil Revision 639/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-26
|
Kamsurun Nessa @ Kamrun Nessa Vs. Ramiza Akhter and others |
|
|
35 |
Civil Revision 2680/2011
(Civil Revision 2680/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-26
|
Md. Idris Ali Mondal Vs. Md. Naimuddin Mondol and others |
|
|
36 |
Civil Misc 20/2025
(Civil Misc 20/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-MAR-26
|
Most. Mahfuza Begum -Versus- Mosa. Rezia Begum and others. |
Discharged. |
|
37 |
Civil Revision 667/2024
(Civil Revision 667/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-MAR-26
|
Md. Soaib Mollah and others. -Versus- Safayet Hossain and others |
Discharged. |
|
38 |
Civil Revision 5070/2007
(Civil Revision 5070/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-MAR-26
|
Md. Amir Ali -Versus- Md. Abdul Aziz and anohter. |
Disposed of. |
|
39 |
Civil Revision 2580/2018
(Civil Revision 2580/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-MAR-26
|
Md. Amir Ali and others. -Versus- Md. Shamsuzzaman and others. |
Discharged. |
|
40 |
Writ Petition 5055/2024
(Writ Petition 5055/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-MAR-26
|
Md. Tajul Islam Taj versus Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others |
Discharged |
|
41 |
Civil Revision 2132/2025
(Civil Revision 2132/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 29-MAR-26
|
Dhaka Bank Limited VS. Otto Textile Mills Limited and others |
|
|
42 |
Criminal Appeal(H) (TN) 2914/2019
(Criminal Appeal No. 2914/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 29-MAR-26
|
Md. Moniruzzaman ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another... Respondents |
The appeal is allowed |
|
43 |
Arbitration Application 3/2014
(Arbitration Application 03/2014)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 29-MAR-26
|
Save the Children. -Versus- Padakhep Manabik Unnayan Kendra. |
Dismissed |
|
44 |
Admiralty Suit 13/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-MAR-26
|
Sabera Begum Vs. M.V. TITU 54 and others. |
The application for release of the defendant No. 1 vessel from the order of arrest is disposed of. |
|
45 |
Admiralty Suit 8/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-MAR-26
|
Grandee Central East Shipping LLC Vs. M.V. PRINCESS JIA JIA and others. |
The application for vacating the order of arrest is disposed of. |
|
46 |
Criminal Revision 5646/2024
(Criminal Revision 5646/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-MAR-26
|
Raju Ahmed ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ... Opposite parties |
The Criminal Revision is disposed of |
|
47 |
Criminal Revision 77/2023
(Criminal Revision 77/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-MAR-26
|
Sonia Akhter ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ... Opposite parties |
The Criminal Revision is disposed of |
|
48 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 12331/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-MAR-26
|
Md. Maksudur Rahman Masud -Vs- The State |
Suspicion, however strong, is no substitute for proof, and in criminal law the prosecution is to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. The purpose of cross-examination is to assist the Court in bringing the truth to light by discovering or clarifying matters with which witnesses may wish to conceal or confuse for motives of partisanship. one witness was examined-in-chief, and her examination was adjourned after a few sentences were recorded in cross-examination. the probative value of the evidence might be very small and might even be disregarded. the confession of a co-accused cannot be used against the other co-accused, and the confession of a co-accused can be used against another co-accused if the said confession stands corroborated by other corroborative evidence. the confession of the co-accused, Shafiul Bashor Rakib, cannot be the sole basis for the conviction of the accused appellant, as the facts and circumstances of the instant case are not corroborated by other evidence. If a material witness who would unroll the genesis of incident is not convincingly brought to fore otherwise or where there is a gap or infirmity in the prosecution case which could have been supplied or made by examining a witness who, though available is not examined, prosecution case can be termed as suffering from a serious deficiency and infirmity and withholding of a such a material and vital witness would oblige the Court to draw an adverse inference against the prosecution by holding that if the witness would have been examined he would not have supported the prosecution case as projected.
In the instant case, the informant, i.e., P.W. 1, in his evidence stated that, upon hearing his hue and cries, an army vehicle carrying soldiers arrived and rescued him. However, the investigating agency did not deem it necessary to examine them as witnesses or record their statements under section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which constitutes gross irregularities and negligence on the part of the investigating agency. |
|
49 |
Criminal Revision 1909/2021
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-MAR-26
|
Md. Habibur Rahman -Vs- The State and another |
The court did not arrived at any independent in finding as to metter the injury was grievious hurt and simple hurt on which injury grievious hurt and which in simple hurt to convict the accused petitioner under Section 326 of the Penal Code, the court must come to definite finding with reference to evidence on the record that the injury caused by the accused is a grievious hurt. An injury is grievous hurt if it falls within the meaning of grievous hurt as given in Section 320 of the Penal Code. there is no iota of evidence on record to show that the victim ever sustained permanent privation of sight of either eye, privation of hearing of either ear, privation of any member of joint destruction or permanant impairing of powers or any member of joint, permanant disfiguration of the head of face and in view of such facts and circumstances, we are unable to believe the contention of the prosecution that the injury sustained by the victim come under the mischief of section 326A or 326 of the penal code. the doctor, who issued the certificate, though, according to the prosecution, conducted treatment of the victim, was not examined, and no explanation was offered by the prosecution before the court as to why he was not examined. This court cannot presume the cause of injury of the victim as it cannot rely upon the Medical Certificate, as the said document was not proved in terms of the provisions of Section 45 of the Evidence Act,1872. As the cause of the victim’s injury has not been proved, in our view, the petitioner is entitled to acquittal. while examining the accused appellants under section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure the trial Court failed to put the incriminating evidence against the accused appellants for the purpose of enabling them to explain any circumstance and thereby the accused appellants have been prejudiced. Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides that the accused of Criminal Procedure provides that the accused should be examined for the purpose of enabling him to explain any circumstance appearing in the evidence against him. But in the instant case no incriminating circumstance was put to the accused appellants. The razor allegadly used by the accused Shahid in the commission of the offence was not at all put to him while he was examined under section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and thereby the accused appellant has been seriously prejudiced in conducting his defence in the trial. |
|
50 |
Criminal Revision 1154/2022
(Criminal Revision 1154/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-MAR-26
|
|
|
