Orders : Appellate Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
The State
vs
Mawlana Sheikh Abdus Salam and ors.
`21st August Grenade Attack` advance order
2
The State vs Zainul Abedin @ Advocate Zainul Abedin and another
Guidelines on period of anticipatory bail.
3

Government and others
Vs
Md. Mainul Haque and others

As per the relevant Nitimala there is no scope to give MPO to a teacher who has been appointed out of pattern and the writ petitioners having been appointed as a non-MPO post against the section teacher and their claimed of MPO benefit by avoiding the said ‘Nitimala’ cannot be enforced.

4
Mr. Md. Sanaullah, (Retired)
Vs
Government of Bangladesh and others
In the instant case there was no judicial or departmental proceedings pending against the petitioner at the time of his retirement; even no proceedings either judicial or department had been initiated against him within a year of his retirement. Thus, the action taken by the authority stopping the pay of the pension to the petitioner has no legal basis.
5
Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others =Vs= Md. Kamal Hossain and others
In view of the above two reported cases the earlier decision by this Division as reported in 18 MLR(AD), 372 has become in-operative and redundant. So it is now well settled that Court cannot pass an order to absorb the employees/officers of a project who have been appointed on contract basis under the revenue budget unless there is any statutory provision and thus the respondents claim of absorption in revenue budget on the principal or theory of legitimate expectation has got no legal basis.
6
Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others =Vs= Md. Kamal Hossain and others
In view of the above two reported cases the earlier decision by this Division as reported in 18 MLR(AD), 372 has become in-operative and redundant. So it is now well settled that Court cannot pass an order to absorb the employees/officers of a project who have been appointed on contract basis under the revenue budget unless there is any statutory provision and thus the respondents claim of absorption in revenue budget on the principal or theory of legitimate expectation has got no legal basis.
7
8
National Bank Limited and another Vs M.R. Trading Company, represented by Alhaj Md. Mizanur Rahman and others
9
Mufti Abdul Hannan Munshi alias Abul Kalam and another vs The State
Mufti Abdul Hannan Munshi alias Abul Kalam and another vs The State
10
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.19 OF 2015 (Author of the article-The Daily Janakantha)
এই সাইটটি প্রদর্শিত হয়েছে :