201

Criminal Appeal(A) 127/2014
(Judgment)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-NOV-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Md. Shukur Ali and another Vs The State

 It is true that there is no eye witness in the instant case, but the inculpatroy, true, and voluntary confessional statements of two accused, and the circumstances particularly long absconsion by Shukur and Sentu are so well connected to indicate that those circumstances render no other hypothesis other than the involvement of the appellants in the alleged rape and murder thereof. The confessional statement of a co-accused can be used for the purpose of crime control against other accused persons even if there is a little bit of corroboration of that confessional statement by any sort of evidence either direct or circumstantial.  In performing our duties, this court is charged with the task of not only assessing the facts against the law, but also considering the impacts of judgments that are pronounced and any assessment made on the overall justice system.  With modern criminal justice mechanism, the right against self-incrimination is one that stands as a cornerstone. As such, confessions by a co-accused are generally inadmissible against the accused in a concerned case. However, in our duties of administering justice, we are sometimes faced with a case that forces us to consider aspects of larger policy at play.  The balance between crime control and due process models of justice is such a consideration that requires reassessment with changing times and upon the fact of each case. The case before us is one of such a heinous crime, where measures of control are made far more necessary, to ensure that justice can be brought to the victim in question. As such, while due process is still of utmost importance; crime control considerations must be made as well.  We find strong circumstantial evidence in the instant case that the deceased was raped before murder by the appellants. Before killing, appellant Shukur Ali stabbed Sabina with the knife on the different parts of her body including on her private organ which resulted to her harrowing death.  We are of the view that undue sympathy to impose inadequate sentence would do more harm to the justice system to undermine the public confidence on the judiciary. It is the duty of the Court to award appropriate sentence considering the gravity of the offence. Considering the nature and gravity of the offence committed by the appellant Shukur Ali, we are of the view that the cruelty and violence with which he killed Sabina, the ends of justice demands his death sentence.

202

Criminal Petition 1088/2019
(CRIMINAL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO.1088 OF 2019)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 24-NOV-21
From : COURT NO. 1

The State =Vs= Aslam Shikder

From the order dated the 18th of June, 2019 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal No.5923 of 2019

203

Criminal Appeal(A) 151/2015
(Judgment)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 03-NOV-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Anowar Hossain Vs. The State

As there is no eye witness in the instant case, we are inclined to examine the circumstantial evidence. The principle of circumstantial evidence to prove the guilt of an accused is that the prosecution has to prove the circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt and the chain of circumstances should be cogent and consistent showing that the accused is compatible with the circumstances. If the evidence is analyzed, we can find the chain of circumstances linking on fact with the other about the complicity of the convict-appellant. The first chain was to take the deceased by the appellant towards the house of the informant, the father of the deceased. The second chain was the so called abduction of the deceased in the custody of the appellant but he did not raise any alarm after the abduction. The third chain was not to inform the informant and the police station regarding the abduction, rape and killing of the deceased in front of the appellant. Fourth chain was that the appellant was looking pale and suspicious after the occurrence as narrated by P.Ws.1 and 2. We find the consistency regarding the involvement of the convict-appellant Anowar Hossain so far as regards the chain of circumstances disclosed in the instant case.

204

Civil Appeal 28/2019
(CIVIL APPEALNOS. 28-44, 46-67, 69-100, 102-103, 105, 107-111, 113-127, 129-131, 134-144, 147-164, 166-204, 206-223, 225, 227-229, 231-242, 244-254, 256-266 AND 268-271 OF 2019 WITH C.P. NOS.1978 OF 2018 AND 4404 OF 2018)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 07-SEP-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Md. Fazlul Haque Sarder -Vs- Grameen Phone Limited and others

From the judgement and order dated the 15th day of December, 2016 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition Nos. 16679 to 16752, 16782 to 16859, 16926 to 16963, 16969 to 16970, 16972 to 16990, 17000 to 17018, 17058 to 17117 and 17268 of 2012

205

Civil Appeal 18/2014
(Civil Appeal 18/2014)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 07-SEP-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Islami Bank Bangladesh Ltd -Vs - Bengal Techno Leather Ltd.

From the judgement and order dated the 28th day of November, 2012 passed by the High Court Division in Summary Suit No.5 of 2012

206

Criminal Petition 1768/2019
(Judgment dated 02.06.2021)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-AUG-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Phoenix Finance and Investment Limited (PFIL), Principal Branch, Eunoos Centre (Level-11), 52-53, Dilkusha Commercial Area, Motijheel, Dhaka. Vs Yeasmin Ahmed and another

207

Civil Petition 2103/2020
(with CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APEAL NO.2151 OF 2020)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-AUG-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Government of Bangladesh VS Ali Karam Reza

208

Criminal Review Petition 82/2017
(Date of hearing: 20.06.2019, 11.07.2019, 24.11.2020.)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUL-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Ataur Mridha alias Ataur -Vs- The State

From the judgment and order dated 14.02.2017 passed by Appellate Division in Criminal Appeal No.15 of 2010.

209

Criminal Appeal(A) 9/2013
(CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.09-10 OF 2013 WITH JAIL PETITION NO.08 OF 2013)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-JUN-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Aziz and others Vs The State

From the judgment and order dated 29.11.2012 passed by the High Court Division in Death Reference No.53 of 2007 with Jail Appeal Nos.763, 764, 765 of 2007 and Criminal Appeal No.3341 of 2007

210

Civil Appeal 173/2011

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-JUN-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Saudi Arabian Airlines Corporation represented by its Country Manager, Dhaka Office =Vs= M/S Saudi Bangladesh Services Company, Ltd. Orchard Plaza, 71 Nayapaltan (VIP Road), Dhaka and represented by its Managing Director

From the judgment and order dated 15.01.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Arbitration Case No.02 of 2006

211

Civil Appeal 93/2010

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-JUN-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Kanai Chandra Das =Vs = Sree Nipendra Chandra Mondal

From the judgment and order dated 13.10.2008 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.1576 of 2003

212

Civil Appeal 25/2005

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-JUN-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Md. Iqbal Hossain Talukder Vs Md. Joinal Abedin Talukder

From the judgment and order dated 20.08.2002 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.2113 of 1998

213

Civil Appeal 2/2012

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-JUN-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Zahid Hossain being dead his heirs- Nadim Hossain and another
Vs
Syed Fazlul Kader being dead his heirs- Halima Kader and others

From the judgment and order dated 12.02.2009 passed by the High Court Division in Civil Revision No.3795 of 2003

214

Civil Appeal 234/2007

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-JUN-21
From : COURT NO. 1

Maves Jasmin and others Vs Md. Ruhul Amin-3 and others

From the judgment and order dated 09.03.2006 passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.4714 of 2001.

215

Criminal Appeal(A) 22/2012
(Dismissed with modification of sentence of death.)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 03-JUN-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Md. Humayun, son of Motaleb Vs. The State

In this case, apart from the oral evidence of the prosecution witnesses, there are the confessional statements of the present appellant Md. Humayun and accused Mohan. Since the appellant Md. Humayun preferred appeal, his confessional statement is relevant in the instant case and hence, his confessional statement is discussed thereof. During recording the confessional statement, the Magistrate followed the procedure instructed to be followed by the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. From the reading of confessional statement, it is found that the confessional statement was made voluntarily and it is true and it can well form the basis of conviction of the appellant. Moreover, the confessional statement of the appellant supports the evidence of the eye witnesses i.e. PWs 14 and 15. It is well settled that the confessional statement can be the sole basis of conviction if it is made voluntarily and it is true. In the instant case, the confessional statement of the appellant is voluntary and true as well as this confessional statement supports the depositions of eye witnesses, PWs 14 and 15.

216

Jail Appeal(A) 4/2014

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 24-MAY-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Zamir and others Vs The State

• If it appears that the confessional statement was made by the accused out of fear, threat and coercion, then confession would be irrelevant in the court proceedings to convict the accused based on that confession. • In a case of conspiracy the subsequent behavior of the conspirators are considered as important factors. In the instant case, the prosecution tried to prove the above mentioned conduct of convict-appellants Sirajul Islam, Sohel and Rajib that lead us to conclude that the convict Sirajul Islam, Sohel and Rajib with Zamir conspired to kill the deceased Aktar Hossain and all of his family members. In case of conspiracy the conspirators conspire among themselves, there remains no eye witness. They make design and prepare plan to execute the same and in furtherance of their conspiracy and common intention execute the plan. In the instant case, the motive, behavior of the convict-appellants are very much clear to execute the alleged killing in a planned way and as per Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872 the convict-appellants Sirajul Islam, Sohel and Rajib are guilty for committing the occurrence. • If the evidence is analyzed, we can find the chain of circumstances linking one fact with the others about the complicity of the convict-appellants. The first chain was the strained relationship of Sirajul Islam with Aktar Hossain over the share of paternal properties. The second chain was inflicting slap by Aktar to Monowara Begum which angered Sohel and Rajib. The third chain was the presence of Sohel and Rana at late night at about 1:45 am on the road of West Medda Madrasa for which they could not assign any reasonable cause. The fourth chain was the lodging of FIR being so much interested claiming the occurrence committed by the dacoits. The fifth chain was the normal behavior of Sirajul Islam, Sohel and Rajib after the occurrence. The next chain was Rajib got the long hair cut after the occurrence. If one’s uncle with his all family members died, then it is unusual to get the hair cut without being sad. If these facts are considred together, an inevitable conclusion can be drawn up that the convict-appellants Sirajul Islam, Sohel and Rajib became successful to materialise their plan to kill the deceased Aktar Hossain and all of his members out of their previous enmity. • The confessional statement should be retracted at the very earliest opportunity and the belated retraction of confessional statement during examination under section 342 had of no value if it appears before the court that the confessional statement was made voluntarily and it was true… • A confessional statement is evidence against its maker but is not sufficient evidence to convict the other co-accused unless corroborated by other evidence. • The principle of circumstantial evidence to prove the guilt of an accused is that the prosecution has to prove the circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt and the chain of circumstances should be cogent and consistent showing that the accused is compatible with the circumstances. To prove the guilt of an accused based on circumstantial evidence, two categories of circumstances have to be considered. Circumstances before occurrence and circumstances after occurrence.

217

Jail Appeal(A) 9/2014
(The appeal is allowed in part by majority decision with modifications of sentence.)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-MAY-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Shahan Shah Sikder (Tito) and another Vs. The State

o In a murder case, the Court is charged with the supreme duty of making proper appreciation of evidence and of law before reaching the finding that the case proved is culpable homicide amounting to murder. The well settled principle is that if, after an examination of the whole evidence, the Court is of the opinion that there is a reasonable possibility that the defence put forward by the accused might be true, it is clear that such a view reacts on the whole prosecution case. In these circumstances, the accused is entitled to the benefit of doubt, not as a matter of grace, but, as of right, because the prosecution has not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution story must be true. Between “may be true” and “must be true” there is travel and the whole of this distance must be covered by legal, reliable and unpeachable evidence. Proof “beyond reasonable doubt” is a guide line and not a fetish. o Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh is uniquely provided the authority under Article 104 of the Constitution to consider all reasons in order to ensure complete justice. The preamble of the Constitution and Part-III promises to uphold and enumerates fundamental rights, including that of the right to life. It is of utmost importance that the apex Court is allowed the opportunity to award punishment as seen fit for the purposes of administering complete justice. If the law, is contrary to the notion of justice, it is important that the intent of the law be taken into account. Principles of Criminal Justice focus on all aspects of punishment, restitution, retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence and incapacitation. The penalty of death eliminates possibility all of such beyond retribution. Hence, it must be allowed for the Appellate Division of Supreme Court to consider and award punishment that posits all possible outcomes of any punishment rendered. An Act/Or Any Law that confines such notions of justice to only seeking retribution, is ultra vires to the Constitution. This Division has discretion to award any sentence either imprisonment for life or death penalty upon the accused, who committed offence under Section 11(Ka) of the Nari–O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000, (Ain 2000).

218

Criminal Petition 527/2017
(Disposed of)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-APR-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Md. Mujibur Rahman alias Mujibur Rahman Vs. The State and another

The High Court Division altered the conviction from Section 10 to Section 9(4)(kha) of the Nari O Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 (as amended in 2003) and thereby enhanced the sentence imposed upon the convict-petitioner without giving show cause notice or issuing any Rule upon him and such enhancement has been done without following the due process of law as provided in the statute.

219

Civil Appeal 195/2011
(Allowed)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and another. vs. Md. Nazrul Islam and another

The question of legitimate expectation does not arise at all. The question whether the writ-petitioners completely failed to perform their part in the contractual obligations in making the payments in accordance with the terms and conditions as specifically spelt out in the memo dated 09.04.1984 can be decided by a civil court after taking evidence. As the instant case is not maintainable under Article 102 of the Constitution, so the question of the obligations, duties of the parties are not to be dealt with in this forum. We have already discussed in the preceding paragraphs that the issue involves the question of the determination of facts which cannot be decided without taking evidence or examining the parties. The writ petition was not at all maintainable under Article 102 of the Constitution.

220

Civil Petition 2844/2017
(Disposed of)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Md. Syedul Abrar, son of late Ahmed Hossain Vs.Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Primary and Mass Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others

The respondents claimed that the date of hearing was informed to the petitioner, but from the materials on record, it appears that the respondents had not produced any copy of notice given to the petitioner fixing the date of hearing and the petitioner was not given any opportunity to be heard. The inquiry proceeding was held ex-parte, which was not in accordance with law. At the same time the petitioner was not given opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses or to produce evidence in his favour according to Rule 10 of the Government Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1985.

221

Civil Appeal 190/2011
(judgment)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-MAR-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others. Vs. Sadeque Ahmed Nipu, son of late Mohiuddin Ahmed and another

Fraud vitiates everything. If fraud is practiced upon the Court for obtaining any order, then the order of the Court is liable to be set aside. In this present case, it has been proved that the respondents obtained judgment and decree practicing fraud upon the High Court Division. The High Court Division made a serious error of law making the Rule absolute based on fictitious judgment and decree passed in Title Suit No.587 of 1970 dated 15.03.1971, which has no existence at all. So, we are constraint to interfere with the judgment and order passed by the High Court Division in Writ Petition No.6053 of 2008 on 17.12.2009. Accordingly, the judgment and order passed in Writ Petition No.6053 of 2008 on 17.12.2009 is set aside.

222

Criminal Appeal(A) 18/2012
(judgment)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 29-MAR-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Abdus Samad @ Md. Abdus Samad vs.The State

The appellant inflicted ‘shabol’ blow on the head of the deceased with the intention of causing grievous injuries, which were likely to cause death, but the ‘shabol’ blow was inflicted at the spur of the moment in a sudden fight between the parties without any premeditation, as well being provoked by the deceased the appellant lost self-control. Moreover, the act of the appellant falls within the purview of Exception Nos.1 and 4 of Section 300 that is punishable under section 304 Part-I of the Penal Code, which provides that the act by which the death is caused is done with intention of causing death or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death. The High Court Division committed an error of law in convicting the appellant under Sections 302/148 of the Penal Code in holding that “the weapon used was sabol. The accused dealt sabol blow on the vital part of the body. All these show that the accused had intention to kill Khorshed.” The High Court Division failed to consider that, though the appellant has caused the death with the intention, he did the same in a sudden fight, in the heat of passion being provoked by the victim.

223

Criminal Appeal(A) 38/2010
(judgment)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 29-MAR-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Mohammad Amir Ali Mostafa vs Shah Md. Nurul Alam and others

Only because of the subject matter of the criminal case and civil litigation being the same, it will not be a bar for continuation of the criminal proceeding, rather the criminal case will run in its own way. In this case, the respondents should have exhausted the procedure of Section 241A of the Code of Criminal Procedure before making application for quashing of C.R. Case under Section 561A of the Code.

224

Jail Appeal(A) 3/2015
(Judgment)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 24-MAR-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Md. Abdul Mannan @ Mannan, Md. Afsor Ali Sheikh Vs. The State

In this case the appellants retracted their confessional statement during examination under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but in view of the above decision this kind of delayed retraction has no value in the eye of law, if the confessional statement is found true and voluntary.

225

Civil Appeal 138/2010
(Judgment)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 24-MAR-21
From : COURT NO. 3

Md. Masumur Rahman and others Vs. Mrs. Shahar Banu Begum

When the relationship does not exist between the tenant and landlord.

226

Criminal Petition 1271/2017
(ক্রিমিনাল পিটিশন ফর লীভ টু আপীল ১২৭১/২০১৭)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-MAR-21
From : COURT NO. 1

নূর মোহম্মদ বনাম সরকার এবং অন্যান্য

মানুষের ছোটখাটো ঝগড়া বিবাদের ফলে উদ্ভুত মামলাসমূহ বিচারের সময় বিচারিক আদালত যদি প্রবেশন অভ অফেন্ডার অর্ডিন্যান্স ১৯৬০ এর ধারা ৫ বিবেচনায় রাখেন তাহলে এ ধরণের ছোট মামলা সমূহ আপীল বিভাগ পর্যন্ত আসত না ফলে আপীল বিভাগ অন্যান্য গুরুত্বপূর্ণ মামলা পরিচালনায় যথেষ্ট সময় পেতেন। এই "প্রবেশন অব অফেন্ডার্স অর্ডিন্যান্স, ১৯৬০" -এর বিধানাবলী বিচারিক আদালত, আপীল আদালত এবং হাইকোর্ট বিভাগ কর্তৃক প্রয়োগযোগ্য। দায়রা আদালত হিসেবে ক্ষমতাপ্রাপ্ত যেকোন আদালত বা ট্রাইব্যুনাল এবং ১ম শ্রেনীর ম্যাজিস্ট্রেটের ক্ষমতাপ্রাপ্ত যেকোন আদালত বা ট্রাইব্যুনাল -এই আইনের বিধান প্রয়োগ করতে পারবে। সুতরাং বিশেষ ক্ষমতা আইন, ১৯৭৪ (Special Powers Act, 1974) -এর ধারা ২৯, সন্ত্রাস বিরোধী আইন, ১৯৯২ (Anti-Terrorism Act, 1992) -এর ধারা ১৫(১), সন্ত্রাস বিরোধী আইন, ২০০৯ (Anti-Terrorism Act, 2009) -এর ধারা ২৭(৩), নারী ও শিশু নির্যাতন (বিশেষ বিধান) আইন, ১৯৯৫ -এর ধারা ২৩(১), জন নিরাপত্তা (বিশেষ বিধান) আইন, ২০০০ -এর ধারা ২১(১), নারী ও শিশু নির্যাতন দমন আইন ২০০০-এর ধারা ২৫(১), ক্রিমিনাল ল এ‌্যামেন্ডমেন্ট এ‌্যাক্ট, ১৯৫৮ -এর ধারা ৬(১)(ক) এবং ফরেন এক্সচেঞ্জ রেগুলেশন এ‌্যাক্ট, ১৯৪৭ -এর ধারা ২৩ক(৩) -এ উল্লেখিত বিধান অনুসারে ক্ষেত্রমতে ট্রাইব্যুনাল অথবা আদালতসমূহ দায়রা আদালত বলে গণ্য হবে। দ্রুত বিচার আইন, ২০০২ -এর ধারা ১২(২) অনুসারে ১ম শ্রেণীর ম্যাজিস্ট্রেট আদালত বলে গণ্য হবে এবং ফরেন এক্সচেঞ্জ রেগুলেশন এ‌্যাক্ট, ১৯৪৭ -এর ধারা ২৩ক(৩) অনুসারে ক্ষেত্রবিশেষ ট্রাইব্যুনাল ১ম শ্রেণীর ম্যাজিস্ট্রেট আদালত অথবা দায়রা আদালত বলে গণ্য হবে।

227

Civil Petition 743/2017
(Civil Petition 743/2017)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-FEB-21
From : COURT NO. 1

মোঃ নুরুল ইসলাম বনাম সফুরুন্নেসা

এই সিভিল পিটিশন ফর লিভ টু আপীলটি হাইকোর্ট বিভাগের ২৪৯৪/২০১৪ নং সিভিল মামলার রায় ও আদেশের বিরুদ্ধে। ইহা একটি অগ্রক্রয়ের মামলা। আপীল বিভাগ তাঁর সিদ্ধান্তে বলেন যে মিউনিসিপ্যালিটি/ পৌরসভার বাহিরে রায়তের বসতবাড়ি অধিগ্রহণ ও প্রজাস্বত্ত্ব আইন ১৯৫০ এর ধারা ৯৬ প্রযোজ্য হবে। অর্থাৎ গ্রামাঞ্চলের বসতবাড়ির জমি বসতবাড়ি হওয়া স্বত্ত্বে ও রাষ্ট্রীয় অধিগ্রহণ ও প্রজাস্বত্ত্ব আইন ১৯৫০ এর ধারা ৯৬ অনুসারে অগ্রক্রয়যোগ্য

228

Civil Appeal 157/2010
(Civil Appeal 157/2010)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-FEB-21
From : COURT NO. 1

মোঃ মাসুদুর রহমান বনাম মোঃ নজরুল ইসলাম

ইহা হাইকোর্ট বিভাগের ৭৫৪৭/২০০৩ নং রীট মামলার রায় ও আদেশের বিরুদ্ধে একটি আপীল যাহা আপীল বিভাগ কর্তৃক খারিজ হয়। অত্র মামলায় কোর্ট লীজ/ ইজারা সম্পর্কিত বিষয়ে বলেন বিরোধীয় ইজারাকৃত জমির ব্যাপারে যথাযথ কর্তৃপক্ষের নিকট আপীল চলাকালীন সময়ে পূর্বে লীজ গ্রহীতার লীজ বাতিল করা সম্পূর্ণ বেআইনী। কোর্ট আরো বলেন, কোনো ব্যক্তি তার নিজের পক্ষে বিচারক হইবেনা। কারণ অত্র মামলায় প্রতিবাদী নজরুল ইসলামের অনূকুলের লীজ জেলা প্রশাসকের মৌখিক আদেশে ইউ.এন.ও কর্তৃক বেআইনিভাবে বাতিল করা হয় যার ফলে ঐ বাতিল আদেশের বিরুদ্ধে আনীত আপীলে জেলা প্রশাসক আপীল কর্তৃপক্ষ হওয়া ও বেআইনী।

229

Criminal Appeal(A) 63/2017
(Crl.A No. 63-66 of 2017
Date of hearing : 04.12.2019 and 29.01.2020
Date of Judgment: 18-02-2020.)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-SEP-20
From : COURT NO. 1

Md. Abul Kaher Shahin
Vs
Emran Rashid and another

[Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881]
[From the judgment and order dated 31.08.2016 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal Nos.2116-2119 of 2016.]
These Criminal Appeals being Appeal Nos. 63-66 of 2017 are directed against the common judgment and order dated 31.08.2016 passed by the High Court Division in Criminal Appeal Nos.2116-2119 of 2016 reversing those dated 17.02.2016 passed by the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Sylhet in Sessions Case Nos.3079 of 2013, 172 of 2014, 174 of 2014 and 3080 of 2013.

230

Civil Appeal 28/2019
(Civil Appeal 28/2019)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-AUG-20
From : COURT NO. 1

231

Civil Petition 994/2018
(with 990 and 993 of 2018)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 20-FEB-20
From : COURT NO. 1

The Director General, represented by Bangladesh Rural Development Board (BRDB), Dhaka VS Md. Rabeul Karim and others

232

Civil Appeal 48/2017
(WITH C.R.P NO.325 OF 2017 AND CIVIL PETITION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL NO.1882 OF 2018 WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO.15 OF 2016 WITH C.R.P.NO.611 OF 2018)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 10-FEB-20
From : COURT NO. 1

Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture, Bangladesh Secretariat Dhaka and others VS Mohammad Hasan and others

233

Civil Review Petition 305/2015
([WITH C.R.P. NOS. 315-316 OF 2015 AND C.R.P. NO. 320 OF 2015 AND C.P. NO.2367 OF 2010])

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-NOV-19
From : COURT NO. 2

Mahbubul Anam Vs Ministry of Land, represented by its Secretary Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others

Cancellation of long term lease granted by the government for the purpose of constructing hotels in the hotel/motel zone of Cox’s Bazar:
Dismissing the review petitions, the Court directed that all leases within Jhilanja Mouza of Cox’s Bazar granted after 19.04.1999 be cancelled in the same way as those of the writ-petitioners and any constructions made thereon be demolished; the leaseholders shall be compensated for their loss due to such cancellation/ demolition.
It was further directed that henceforth no lease shall be granted within Jhilanja Mouza or any area which has been classified as ecologically critical area.

234

Civil Appeal 460/2017

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-OCT-19
From : COURT NO. 1

The Secretary, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock and others Vs Abdur Razzak and others

235

Civil Appeal 89/2007

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Kazi Fazlus Sobhan being dead his heirs: Kazi Fazle Rabbi and others Vs Government of Bangladesh and others

236

Civil Appeal 129/2018

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

S.M . Masud Hasan @ Masud Vs Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No.3, Dhaka and others

237

Civil Petition 4348/2018

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Hosneara Begum, Advocate Vs A.K.M. Bahauddin alias Bahar and others

238

Civil Petition 1187/2018

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others Vs Shah Jamal Mollah and another

239

Civil Petition 2050/2017

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Kazi Rafiqul Islam Vs Md. Anwar Hossain Advocate and another

240

Civil Review Petition 659/2017

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka Vs S.M. Abdur Rauf and another

241

Civil Review Petition 40/2019

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Finance Department, Ministry of Finance, Bangladesh Secretariat Building, P.S.Shahabagh, Dhaka and others Vs Md. Salim Khan

242

Civil Appeal 121/2018

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Managing Director, Rupali Bank Ltd., Head Office, Dhaka Vs Md. Shahrier Perves and others

243

Civil Petition 1589/2018

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna Dhaka

244

Civil Appeal 458/2017

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Rana Surong Vs Government of Bangladesh and others:

245

Civil Appeal 175/2005

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-SEP-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Khalishpur Jute Mills Ltd. Vs Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakkha

246

Civil Petition 3790/2018

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-19
From : COURT NO. 1

National Bank Limited and another Vs M.R. Trading Company, represented by Alhaj Md. Mizanur Rahman and others

247

Criminal Petition 107/2019

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 19-AUG-19
From : COURT NO. 1

The State Vs. Professor Dr. Morshed Hasan Khan

248

Civil Appeal 19/2008

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 20-MAY-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Mrs. Jahanara Hossain and others VS Surajit Kumar Das and others

249

Civil Appeal 30/2015

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 20-MAY-19
From : COURT NO. 1

Election Commissoin for Bangladesh VS Md. Golam Mostafa and others

250

Civil Appeal 99/2018

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 20-MAY-19
From : COURT NO. 1

The Public Service Commission VS Ripon Chandra Shil and others